That's why I wanted to float on here what he said to see if anyone knows of an alternative narrative or if it more or less checks out. The turnaround of DLP may actually be one positive thing for which he deserves some credit.
The only alternative narrative would be if the initiative to take full control of the resort started before he became head of parks and it coincidently became true once he was in charge, but DLP had been such an afterthought of the company for so long that nobody else has bothered to corroborate or give their side of the story up until this point
That's basically what he describes. He mentions being shocked by decaying facades and fountains choked with algae and being shocked again when he was told they couldn't do anything about it because there was no budget and the ownership structure made it next to impossible to resolve that issue. Again, from his telling, he faced a lot of scepticism when he proposed Disney take over the resort, but pushed ahead also with Iger's support and made it happen which paved the way for the turnaround of the resort.
While they didn't own the resort outright, it's decline in the late 2000s, early 2010s happened under the watch of Iger and others. While we rightfully point out the lull in investment at WDW during that time they also weren't held accountable for allowing DLP to slide into decline so visibly. Obviously things have changed since but it shouldn't have gotten so bad to begin with.