I’m not even saying it might happen. But Disney has no qualms about ruining good design and we shouldn’t tell ourselves Disneyland Paris is somehow different. It’s just been lucky that finances have forced focus elsewhere so the park has largely been spared.I’m not sure anyone here is arguing that they particularly want it to happen. Just that it is a feasible option that may happen one day far off in the future.
I think we all know ruining a good view won’t stop them from doing things.
I’m not even saying it might happen. But Disney has no qualms about ruining good design and we shouldn’t tell ourselves Disneyland Paris is somehow different. It’s just been lucky that finances have forced focus elsewhere so the park has largely been spared.
Disneyland Paris has been letting half of its boat fleet sit and literally rot away for years now.While circumstantial similarities may be found, there are also notable differences. For starters, the riverboat was more popular at Paris and Anaheim. The ferryboats provide a similar enough experience to many people, which isn't the case at other castle parks. Lastly, alligators are not an issue at those other castle parks. So while anything is possible, it's far from a one-to-one.
Disneyland Paris has been letting half of its boat fleet sit and literally rot away for years now.
The ferry boats are not a similar experience. That comes from posters being deliberately obtuse.
Alligators were not a factor. This is just peak copium. Disneyland Paris isn’t Disney’s Special little park where they’ll care about the design and thematic intent.
With so much space available for expansion around the park and especially in Frontierland, and with Disneyland Paris expanding the park once in the last 30 years, it makes sense to think they won't touch the river in many many years. Of course nothing is impossible, but there are many other cheaper ways to expand the park without having to face the issues of touching the river.I’m shocked people are so adamant that Disneyland Paris’ river is untouchable.
Disneyland Paris has been letting half of its boat fleet sit and literally rot away for years now.
The ferry boats are not a similar experience. That comes from posters being deliberately obtuse.
Alligators were not a factor. This is just peak copium. Disneyland Paris isn’t Disney’s Special little park where they’ll care about the design and thematic intent.
I think it's just people who are quite knowledgeable about the direction of DLP past, present and future think it's a very unlikely option and one that really isn't worth the time and effort to discuss.I’m shocked people are so adamant that Disneyland Paris’ river is untouchable.
With so much space available for expansion around the park and especially in Frontierland, and with Disneyland Paris expanding the park once in the last 30 years, it makes sense to think they won't touch the river in many many years. Of course nothing is impossible, but there are many other cheaper ways to expand the park without having to face the issues of touching the river.
I think it's just people who are quite knowledgeable about the direction of DLP past, present and future think it's a very unlikely option and one that really isn't worth the time and effort to discuss.
For years even decades people have been discussing about how Frontierland at WDW is too much of a dead end and how a loop would make the park easier to navigate and how WDW ops wanted to either increase the utilisation of Tom Sawyer's Island or get rid of it. Whereas I don't think I've ever heard a whisper of the DLP river being removed until it was suggested in this thread a few days ago.
Despite being owned by TWDC now, saner heads prevail and they understand what a theme park is actually about.But it’s undeniable it’s a large plot that’s mostly underutilised, it’s certainly not pushing merchandise or Premier Access.
Despite being owned by TWDC now, saner heads prevail and they understand what a theme park is actually about.
The Orlando decision was political as much as anything else. Much like 20K was.
I would. If I had it.I wouldn’t like to bet a lot of money that DLP’s river will still be there in 40 years time.
I would. If I had it.
Completely different reasons.You’d have made the same bet about WDW too at one point.
Completely different reasons.
Ops have been crying out for help with crowds for over a decade. Add in political correctness and social politics, getting rid of an expensive to maintain and run boat and island, wildlife issues, a large body of water that needed looking after plus the opportunity to squeeze in marketable new attractions thatIndeed, it seems to be driven partly by logistical reasons, and partly by deeming US history in general and Frontierland politically problematic.
One final extra reason: WDW forever seems to lack proponents within and without TWDC who will fight for it, fight for its historical and creative worth.Ops have been crying out for help with crowds for over a decade. Add in political correctness and social politics, getting rid of an expensive to maintain and run boat and island, wildlife issues, a large body of water that needed looking after plus the opportunity to squeeze in marketable new attractions thatcanwill all be highly monetised and the accountants won.
This one did. The pushback internally was much more than expected.One final extra reason: WDW forever seems to lack proponents within and without TWDC who will fight for it, fight for its historical and creative worth.
And if it does, will they close a different station? Hope not. Such a bizarre way to run the trains.Is Fantasyland station going to reopen soon?
![]()
DLP Works™ (@dlp.works) on Threads
[Live] 🚧🚂 Major refurbishment works at Fantasyland Station nearing completion! ➡️ After several months of renovation, most structural & aesthetic elements appear fully refurbished. ➖ Platform paving and surrounding infrastructure show completed finishing works. ➡️💐 Horticulture teams are now...www.threads.com
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.