Just to make your life easier I would say go with a 24-70... If you were to get a 28 then you would likely be swapping with the 50 now and again and it would just be easier if you are on a trip to have 1 lens instead of two to deal with. On a full frame like th a7iii either lens would likely be as wide of angle as you would normally want, but once in a while you are likely to want to get a little tighter than the 28mm.Thanks for all of your replies. I'm new to using a real camera instead of my phone to capture my wife and daughters beauty. I only have the 55mm 1.8 for my A7iii, and really I'm only planning on using that for at least a few months so I get in the habit of moving to zoom and really work on framing. With that said though, I'm trying to decide on a lens to rent for my daughters bday trip in December. I really like the primes so far, so I don't know if a fast 28mm would be more useful in the parks instead of like a 24-70.
Just to make your life easier I would say go with a 24-70... If you were to get a 28 then you would likely be swapping with the 50 now and again and it would just be easier if you are on a trip to have 1 lens instead of two to deal with. On a full frame like th a7iii either lens would likely be as wide of angle as you would normally want, but once in a while you are likely to want to get a little tighter than the 28mm.
When I went full frame (Canon) everyone said f/4 was fine. I was just dead set on going 2.8 for this mid-range zoom and I'm glad I did. That Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 is my favorite "go to" lens. I have it on my camera most of the time at Disney. Sometimes I wish for a little more length, but the high megapixels mean I can make some pretty severe crops. Love that lens. So sharp.Yeah I've had my eye on the Tmaron 28-70/2.8. I'd prefer the Zeiss 28-70. But it's only f4. So I don't know if that would be helpful inside or even at night without high iso. Which my camera can handle, but I'd prefer not to use it that high. I guess I really should just rent it and see now that I'm reading this post back to myself.
I'm sure I'd be smarter to go with the faster 28-70, right? Especially for a week at the World.
Just take the lens you have now and take some shots outside at night with it set to f 4.0 and see how it perform on the ISO you need to get a good shot. Unless you want to start going for dark ride shots, f4 might be enough for you.Yeah I've had my eye on the Tmaron 28-70/2.8. I'd prefer the Zeiss 28-70. But it's only f4. So I don't know if that would be helpful inside or even at night without high iso. Which my camera can handle, but I'd prefer not to use it that high. I guess I really should just rent it and see now that I'm reading this post back to myself.
I'm sure I'd be smarter to go with the faster 28-70, right? Especially for a week at the World.
I do the same. It does a lot of things well.My EF 24-105 L series Canon.
It's my best all around shooter for places where you want everything from landscape to portrait, and even kinda can do closeups.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.