socaljoeyb
Active Member
I agree with you... I love it.Love it. Looks clean.
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaand apparently everyone besides me hates it.
I agree with you... I love it.Love it. Looks clean.
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaand apparently everyone besides me hates it.
The updated signs don't really mesh with sign design and layout standards any more than the originals did. Not that they're wrong or illegal, just aren't standard.I was thinking maybe the sign requirements changed and they’re trying to update with the Florida jungle outside?
Yeah, the arrows for lanes are pretty confusing compared to standard designs, but the old ones were pretty similar.Most directional signage is actually green, per the Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices (though street name signs often vary by jurisdiction, with blue and brown also being relatively common).
Although there are a handful of exceptions, each color represents a different type of signage with a different purpose. While drivers may not consciously notice the entire color pattern, most are familiar enough to be able to quickly decipher whether they need to read a sign at a particular moment, without actually having to read it.
While jurisdictions and private landowners are allowed to create their own standards, these are generally what is accepted and recognized throughout the US. If and when different designs are created, they should be done purposefully, and with consideration to legibility, clarity, and simplicity. WDW's old(?) signs did this very well, using a bight colors and bold fonts that could be easily read from a distance, and distinguished them from the public roads. Prior to that, most of WDW's signs had been brown, similar to the MUTCD standard for recreation purposes.
- Green: Wayfinding & directional signage
- Blue: Expressway services (gas stations, restaurants, attractions, etc.) & Accessibility-related signage
- White: Regulatory (speed limits, HOV restrictions, parking restrictions, etc.)
- Yellow: Warning (tight curves, steep grades, animal crossings, etc.)
- Orange: Temporary traffic control (typically construction-related)
- Brown: Recreation
- Lime green: Schools & pedestrian crossings
- Red: "Stop" & "Do not enter"
- Purple: Typically associated with toll roads (though not exclusively)
The two different shades of blue on the new sign are perplexing, as they're too similar to one another to really stand out. The arrows also seem difficult to read; they appear to be based on the MUTCD's "down" arrow that's typically used to designate specific lanes from an overhead sign, but are being used as directional arrows to point outward. The fat arrow and narrow tail just don't read clearly in this context. The shapes and colors remind me more of a webpage or mobile app design than something that would be used for a physical sign.
The design of these signs is odd: they're unique enough that they don't comply with the MUTCD, but similar enough that they don't really "feel" any different. They also aren't as clear and easy to read as either the standard signs or the old ones. This seems to be a great example of how something isn't necessarily better just because it's new and/or custom-designed; sometimes existing elements or standard features actually work better.
“Slow news day” is a bit of standard these days…it’s what happens when you feel building stuff is more of a PR move than a necessitySlow news day in the ol' WDW when this is something that is getting people all hot and bothered.
It’s a fairly major change after 30 years.Slow news day in the ol' WDW when this is something that is getting people all hot and bothered.
You’re the guy that paints the purple signs?It's not.
I doubt they straight repainted the road signs. They should have retro reflective sheeting on them to increase night visibility. Paint would eliminate that.The old signs needed to be frequently repainted too. They take abuse from that Florida sun and they would fade badly.
Perhaps…but not for fansIt’s a fairly major change after 30 years.
There’s a reason it’s called plebeian purple.Apparently all the rich people and 20/30-somethings that are spending copious amounts of money at WDW demanded this change.
Guest satisfaction surveys…the way to make it more magical is blue signs and $14 to get into the line for the 47 year old space mountainApparently all the rich people and 20/30-somethings that are spending copious amounts of money at WDW demanded this change.
Nice try but purple was the Patrician colorThere’s a reason it’s called plebeian purple.
I feel most changes like this are some manager's decision to show they did something. It's like those home improvement shows where they paint the brick white or paint the cabinets just to show a change was made.To align with the updated color scheme of the entrance signs and several other areas....
Thats the exact problem: In Disney fandom, everything gets everyone hot and bothered.Slow news day in the ol' WDW when this is something that is getting people all hot and bothered.
The purple signs weren't 'original' to anything.Welp... that's it! No more WDW visits for me anymore!
Honestly though, I'm shocked that the original signs were even still there when I went last November. It definitely brought a tear to my eye to see them in their original glory... but leave it to the Chapek era to even tear that down... Buncha morons.
How dare you? They were original to me!!!The purple signs weren't 'original' to anything.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.