I agree. :wave:
Imagineering or chit chat would be better!
I think it belongs in WDW General Discussion.
I agree. :wave:
Imagineering or chit chat would be better!
yep, this isn't news or a rumor and shouldn't be here. Would be nice if it were moved to WDW general discussion.
To me that just doesnt make sense to me. Why close and change a ride thats popularity is through the roof and nowhere near bad. If its gonna cost just as much to make a new e ticket, why not be creative and make a new e ticket somewhere else in the park, spruce up attendance in adventureland or something. There were rumors about a fire mountain or something in AL, put the money there, dont destroy something that doesnt need to be destroyed.
Im afraid that if they do change SM that they'll make a rrnrc v2 with a space theme, and that would suck. rrnrc already isnt that great of a coaster, its loud and short, and if they do that to sm, blaring all that loud noise in your ear, you'll just have a rrnrc in tomorrowland.
In other words, a place where "a daddy could take his two daughters and have a little fun himself..." At times I think that philosophy has been forgotten. Disney doesn't need loops and heavy G-forces...they need more immersive family adventures.
The thing about e ticket rides is that they eliminate a large percentage of guests ie Children under 48 inches and the heart attack crew (Children and Grandparents).
No, MK needs its current attractions refurbished. It maybe needs ONE more E-Ticket. But it needs refurbishments more.
Nope... only "thrill rides" do that. "E ticket" is not synonymous with "thrill ride".
Soarin', for example, is most certainly an E ticket.
That's exactly what management thinks, and the reason that nothing substantial will be added until the current classics are fully refurbished.
And you disagree? Some of the attractions are in pretty bad shape. The Studios need new attractions more than MK does.
Remember that when Walt was around, things like 'loops and heavy G-forces' just weren't done. Anywhere. And, believe it or not, Walt was around for the Matterhorn. Which was at the time, basically, the most advanced coaster anywhere. So saying 'thrill' rides isn't something Walt would have wanted is false.
Wrong. They need BOTH. Remember that when Walt was around, things like 'loops and heavy G-forces' just weren't done. Anywhere. And, believe it or not, Walt was around for the Matterhorn. Which was at the time, basically, the most advanced coaster anywhere. So saying 'thrill' rides isn't something Walt would have wanted is false.
Actually, I agree with the plan. Why would you think I don't?
I hope that WDW's space mountain is redone comparably to DLR's. After returning from my first trip to DLR and riding theirs, I was blown away by how smooth and new the ride felt. The soundtrack for the coaster was amazing too. WDW's is very rickety and jerky and I think a major refurb for a loved attraction is worth every penny
Nope... only "thrill rides" do that. "E ticket" is not synonymous with "thrill ride".
Soarin', for example, is most certainly an E ticket.
First, I never said there shouldn't be "thrill" rides. Haunted Mansion, Pirates of the Caribbean, and Snow White are "thrill" rides, as they attempt to scare you to a small degree. My argument is against slapping in lame, barely-themed looping roller coasters and vomit-inducing simulators just for the sake of appealing to the daredevil types.
Next, while the Matterhorn was indeed the most advanced coaster of its time, it wasn't by any stretch of the imagination much of a thrill ride. Roller coasters had been around for more than 30 years before his mountain was built, most of which included huge drops and sometimes major G-forces. Now take a look at the Matterhorn. There are little dips here and there, but mostly you just get jerked around a lot. As an indicator of how wild it is, it has the exact same height requirement as Toontown's Gadget Go Coaster - 35" (I don't know that there was even a height requirement on the Matterhorn when it opened). There is a different between the "thrill rides" Walt created and, say, Rock n' Rollercoaster. His thrill rides were ones the whole family could enjoy (though I'm sure some sat them out...I didn't go Haunted Mansion until my father forced me to, either), not ones that required you to be at least 4 feet tall to ride and not easily prone to nausea.
Would Walt allow vomit comets and loops if he were alive today? I don't know. My gut reaction is no, since again, he wanted to create attractions for the whole family. But then his attitude toward things tended to change over time, so who knows.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.