I've often wondered how much of an influence WDW's location has in the sunshine state to the being the #1 tourist draw-in on the globe. In other words, if you were to pick up WDW; everything to the last little detail and drop it verbatim in another location, say Myrtle Beach, Pigeon Forge, Nashville, Branson, etc. Altering absolutely nothing about WDW, just the location alone...how much of a difference would that make in how popular the place is?
You'd obviously have much colder seasons that are not normally witnessed in Fla. You'd have different terrains, different smells & feel of the area. You also wouldn't have the Fla coast just 45-min to an hour away. No palm trees or tropical birds/feel...but everything else we know & love of WDW is as-is.
Most of us here obviously go to Disney because it's, well, Disney! That's what we love and return to, and would most likely keep on returning to no matter where it is...because it's WDW.
But looking at their crowd base as a whole, does WDW benefit the state of Fla, or does BEING in the state of Fla benefit Disney the most? (Hope that makes sense).
You'd obviously have much colder seasons that are not normally witnessed in Fla. You'd have different terrains, different smells & feel of the area. You also wouldn't have the Fla coast just 45-min to an hour away. No palm trees or tropical birds/feel...but everything else we know & love of WDW is as-is.
Most of us here obviously go to Disney because it's, well, Disney! That's what we love and return to, and would most likely keep on returning to no matter where it is...because it's WDW.
But looking at their crowd base as a whole, does WDW benefit the state of Fla, or does BEING in the state of Fla benefit Disney the most? (Hope that makes sense).