rle4lunch
Well-Known Member
Yeah, but that ain't happening. That project would take 3 billion Disney dollars.I wouldn't be heartbroken if Space Mountain replaced Mission: SPACE in this scenario.
Yeah, but that ain't happening. That project would take 3 billion Disney dollars.I wouldn't be heartbroken if Space Mountain replaced Mission: SPACE in this scenario.
What the hell did I just watch
I found your pen.
Just announced: Amazon is bringing all TKitH back for a new (continuing) series!!
I just picked up the P-body Figuarts for like $30 off the site two months ago.I have a feeling you would like what used to be my office.
View attachment 454312View attachment 454313View attachment 454314
Cleary you just have telephoto eyes and pay too much attention to the sights in a designed visual environment.Having seen it with my own two eyes while inside the park, on both cloudy and sunny days from various points around Epcot, the BBB isn’t unobtrusive. It definitely sticks out.
Cleary you just have telephoto eyes and pay too much attention to the sights in a designed visual environment.
Creeping close to panel time?
Personally, I find the solar panels just insulting. "Hey look, we're putting up solar panels just like the Universe of Energy had!!!! See, we get it!!! Even though that ride was about sources of power and this is about comic book characters and a roller coaster, it fits into Epcot because...um...see solar panels!!!" So pandering.
WDW is not 100% self suficient energy-wiseIt's stupid because Disney generates its own power anyway.
The more pictures I see from various angles, I am starting to come to the conclusion that NOT theming the BBB was the right decision (and may have been more of a conscious decision and not simply cost cutting).
Once the decision was made to build this ride in this location, there is no theming that could have been incorporated into the building that would not have distracted from SSE. If you put Tower of Terror next to SSE, it would draw the eye away and compete for attention. A space age / futuristic looking building would do the same thing. Why compete with the park icon. You can't hide a building that big with trees.
So, the best way to hide a large building is to put it out in the open. Driving to WDW or though any large city, we see warehouses and large industrial buildings all of the time. Power plants, water towers, utility poles, and other infrastructure. We have been conditioned to no longer notice these items.
When arriving at the park, the BBB sits off to the side. Most people will not realize it is part of EPCOT and their minds will dismiss it. Once you come into view of SEE, that is what will draw your attention. This large shinny golf ball, THAT is EPCOT. While you will be able to see the building from within the park, it will appear as if it is an industrial warehouse outside of the park. For most people, our minds will ignore it because that is what we are conditioned to do. The more that is done to disguise the building, the more it will stand out.
I think we all agree that it would have been better to build a ride that would not create a visual intrusion. But now that it is there, not hiding it might end up being the best (least objectionable) decision.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.