General political chat

Laketravis

Premium Member
You can certainly make it easier for enforcement though by making the illegal guns less readily available.
Okay, but how? I'm not trying to be antagonistic, it's that I don't think more laws making guns less readily available will make existing laws intended to make guns less readily available more effective. I do think technology is a more viable solution.

Smartphones have done a pretty good job ensuring only it's owner can operate it. Why can't similar technology be utilized to address auto theft, gun safety, and a host of other activities that rely on an individual user?

I don't understand the fear of just making sure responsible gun owners are responsible for their weapons, most of these guns were once legal guns.
Fear? I don't think it's a fear. I think everyone agrees that gun owners should be responsible for their weapons.

But again - how do you propose that responsibility be ensured?

Also laws prohibiting felons don't help at all when the person has yet to commit the felony. If I am killed in a robbery I wont feel better knowing it was the robbers first felony.
The Philadelphia shooter is a felon with multiple convictions. This wasn't his first rodeo.
 
Last edited:

thehowiet

Wilson King of Prussia
Premium Member
Advertisement
Assumption. Prediction. Speculation. Qualified judgment. All semantics that simply dance around my point.
Sounds prejudicial, or extremely biased at best.
 

Club Cooloholic

Well-Known Member
Okay, but how? I'm not trying to be antagonistic, it's that I don't think more laws making guns less readily available will make existing laws intended to make guns less readily available more effective. I do think technology is a more viable solution.

Smartphones have done a pretty good job ensuring only it's owner can operate it. Why can't similar technology be utilized to address auto theft, gun safety, and a host of other activities that rely on an individual user?



Fear? I don't think it's a fear. I think everyone agrees that gun owners should be responsible for their weapons.

But again - how do you propose that responsibility be ensured?



The Philadelphia shooter is a felon with multiple convictions. This wasn't his first rodeo.
Look there are always going to be crimes but you can cut down on it. And obviously I wasn't speaking about the philly shooting, but that is a whole other ball of wax about how these dangerous people keep getting on the streets in the first place. There are states where you don't even have to report your gun stolen, do you think that is a good starting point? And I apologize for earlier, this is a good discussion and I appreciate it.
 

Quinnmac000

Well-Known Member
Gun manufacturers are partially to blame because how far technology is there are so many safety features that could be installed that would help and at the same time potentially increase sales and help reduce regulation.

For example, guns with owner recognition technology. You go to store, buy your gun at store, you provide fingerprint for those who will have access to weapon, weapon recognizes fingerprints and only activates for the owners. At the same time, owners (Whenever)/police( With warrant) can access database and turn off access for those deemed a threat making their weapon nonoperational. Also that same tech can be used to track stolen weapons with location tracking.

Of course, I for see people trying to find loopholes, jailbreaking, hacking and getting around the safety parameters but at the same time, now police officers can have access to a database which can help prevent police brutality in which people without weapons get hurt. It would allow parents who find their guns missing to quickly help prevent their kids from making mistakes. It would provide cover for those who get their guns stolen to not be held reliable for crimes as their weapons are worthless without them being there to use them.
 

Laketravis

Premium Member
Look there are always going to be crimes but you can cut down on it. And obviously I wasn't speaking about the philly shooting, but that is a whole other ball of wax about how these dangerous people keep getting on the streets in the first place. There are states where you don't even have to report your gun stolen, do you think that is a good starting point? And I apologize for earlier, this is a good discussion and I appreciate it.
Of course it would be - and that should be addressed at the state level in those 39 states that don't currently require it.

But then simply reporting a gun stolen accomplishes, what? There is no search by law enforcement for that stolen weapon. It's simply identified as stolen in the event it is used in a crime. Hardly effective.

Technology. Better safeguards exist for lost or stolen smartphones. No laws required.
 
Last edited:

Club Cooloholic

Well-Known Member
Of course it would be - and that should be addressed at the state level in those 39 states that don't currently require it.

But then simply reporting a gun stolen accomplishes, what? There is no search by law enforcement for that stolen weapon. It's simply identified as stolen in the event it is used in a crime. Hardly effective.

Technology. Better safeguards exist for lost or stolen smartphones. No laws required.
I think putting more onus on gun owners to not lose or have the guns stolen or make straw man purchases would help even more. Liability is the key.
 

Laketravis

Premium Member
I think putting more onus on gun owners to not lose or have the guns stolen or make straw man purchases would help even more. Liability is the key.
How so?

One failed proposal that I recall was gun owner's insurance. Like you need to operate a motor vehicle. Problem is, there are still a high number of uninsured drivers and operating a vehicle is a privilege, gun ownership is a right.
 

Tony the Tigger

Well-Known Member
Uhhh, those cowboys are awfully close to each other??? What's up with that??????
Their backs are broke.

So many good points made this morning, I’m using lots of “love” emojis.

And then...

Or you know, people could stop breaking the law..
When you get back from Universal with your magic wand, maybe you can wave it and make that happen across the board - not just re: guns. Simple, right?

Something like enforcing laws laws already on the books????
Except the same laws are not on the books for everyone. Background checks unless you go to a gun show or other workarounds. Why would anyone object to closing that loophole?

Hmm...could it be...brainwashing...by Satan?

Hillary lost WI, MI, and PA by a total of 80,000 votes. So, in your postulation, there are a minimum of 80,000 racists in these 3 states?
In PA alone. Probably just a few counties.
 

Club Cooloholic

Well-Known Member
How so?

One failed proposal that I recall was gun owner's insurance. Like you need to operate a motor vehicle. Problem is, there are still a high number of uninsured drivers and operating a vehicle is a privilege, gun ownership is a right.
And you have a right to that gun, but you will be legally liable for what happens with that gun. Many state also require that you bring your car in for inspection once a year. I think that would be helpful, and it certainly does not deny the right to a weapon, just making sure the weapon is in proper care and has not been lost or stolen while we are at it.
 

Grimley1968

Well-Known Member
Maybe we could pass a law prohibiting snarky posts mocking individuals you don't agree with.
Intentionally mixing up the names of two states to paint one area of a state as racist by comparing it to another state is a good type of post to prohibit. Not to mention an entire region of the country:

Have you been to Pennsyltucky(pretty much between Pittsburgh and Philadelphia)? And what about the south...those numbers are too obvious to even mention am I right?
 

Laketravis

Premium Member
And you have a right to that gun, but you will be legally liable for what happens with that gun. Many state also require that you bring your car in for inspection once a year. I think that would be helpful, and it certainly does not deny the right to a weapon, just making sure the weapon is in proper care and has not been lost or stolen while we are at it.
Legally liable for what happens with your weapon - good idea. But then that's a post-situational consequence, meaning something bad has to happen for it to be relevant. So in terms of preventative measure, it's a rather weak effort.

Annual weapons inspection - again, sounds like a good idea. I'm not sure what would be inspected or how you would effectively compel someone to report for inspection so again, as a preventative measure it's rather weak.

That's why I circle back to technology because it has the potential to address many issues pre-situational. I can hand you my smartphone but unless I unlock the screen first, it's useless to you. Yet I can hand you my weapon and..............
 

Club Cooloholic

Well-Known Member
Intentionally mixing up the names of two states to paint one area of a state as racist by comparing it to another state is a good type of post to prohibit. Not to mention an entire region of the country:
For a right winger you are really into censorship. One...is that offensive to Pennsylvania or Kentucky? Also, I didn't invent this, heck it even has it's own wiki page, lol lighten up. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pennsyltucky
Perhaps if I quoted James Carville you would be less offended(and who gets called snowflakes here?)
EDIT: Where were you during the ****hole comments. The people of Baltimore needed you!
 
Last edited:

aw14

Well-Known Member
Have you been to Pennsyltucky(pretty much between Pittsburgh and Philadelphia)? And what about the south...those numbers are too obvious to even mention am I right?
Tad bit elitist no? As someone who moved from NY to Pa, your generalizations are 👍🏻 This is part of the reason why discussions turn so quickly. This desire to paint all people who voted 1 way as a fascist, racist or whatever demeaning descriptor you like. Then, once the discussion goes nowhere, the person advocating for those descriptors can feign outrage and how the other side just refuses to want to get things done. Rinse/repeat. 🙄
 

Club Cooloholic

Well-Known Member
Legally liable for what happens with your weapon - good idea. But then that's a post-situational consequence, meaning something bad has to happen for it to be relevant. So in terms of preventative measure, it's a rather weak effort.

Annual weapons inspection - again, sounds like a good idea. I'm not sure what would be inspected or how you would effectively compel someone to report for inspection so again, as a preventative measure it's rather weak.

That's why I circle back to technology because it has the potential to address many issues pre-situational. I can hand you my smartphone but unless I unlock the screen first, it's useless to you. Yet I can hand you my weapon and..............
Heck I agree the smartphone idea sounds good., but you would never get that passed. Just being realistic.
 
Top Bottom