Legal Mindset lives in Miami and a quick search showed that his most popular / famous videos and tiktok involve “don’t answer any questions if you’re arrested”.. Maybe special districts don’t garner many views.
Already covered - you can scroll back at your leisure.
Geoff Morrell Out as Disney Communications Chief After Less Than Four Months
Geoff Morrell has been pushed out as Disney communications chief in the wake of the botched 'Don't Say Gay' response.variety.com
So WDW Pro overrules Legal Mindset. Got it.Legal Mindset lives in Miami and a quick search showed that his most popular / famous videos and tiktok involve “don’t answer any questions if you’re arrested”.. Maybe special districts don’t garner many views.
But if you go back a few pages you’ll find many posts where WDW Pro attempted to address the issues raised by posters here, including attorneys I believe, only for most of his points to be refuted.
Honestly, Legal Mindset just hates Disney and wants to see them suffer here. He also failed to hit the larger broader points that are in Disney's favor here. And his expertise is in recent district law, not what was signed into law 50 years ago.
He doesn’t live in central Florida and how do you actually know he’s worked on special districts.
WDW pro was promoting legal mindset. The issue is that legal mindset stated some easy disprovable things in that video. (For example, he claims that Reedy Creek is the only special district ever created by a special act - that is easily disprovable by a quick 30 second Google Search. Daytona racetrack district, for example, was also created by special act. ). There were a number of other outright factual errors that many people here identified as being incorrect - so if he can't get basic facts right, how are supposed to accept his conclusions?
Uh no. Not what I was saying at all. WDW Pro used Legal Mindset for a video on his site. Posters here pointed out factual errors and inconsistencies in the video. WDW Pro then tried to “defend” Legal Mindset and created even more holes for both of them.
Worked on is also a description that can mean a lot of different things. Interns do work. Associates do work. Partners do work. Those things aren’t the same, but “Worked on X” would be a true statement for all three.
Not sure what it says about TWDC if the dude was somehow able to stay on with BP after the oil spill and navigate through that debacle and yet he couldn’t handle this circus for 3 months.Geoff Morrell Out as Disney Communications Chief After Less Than Four Months
Geoff Morrell has been pushed out as Disney communications chief in the wake of the botched 'Don't Say Gay' response.
Not everyone is as talented as Zenia, I guess.
.
I have to agree, lawyers say anything to support their opinion. Like all of us do on these discussion forums
What exactly did he have you hopefully for?I have to agree, lawyers say anything to support their opinion. Like all of us do on these discussion forums
We all know, nothing we say on these forums say will make any difference.
The “Legal Mindset” attorney had be hopeful.
I am now back to hopeless.
But wait, each of us are free to believe what uninformed information posted on these forums we choose, right?
I am back to hopeful
1. If RCID as it existed was unconstitutional the governor would not have needed legislation passed to dissolve it. And if it was unconstitutional why did the Supreme Court in 1968 unanimously rule in the districts favor.
- They will simply create a new complaint special district to replace RCID; a district similar to RCID, but a modern one, compliant to the Florida constitution like all the current special districts; Disney giving up some power.
- Even if DCID is dissolved and there is no replacement, Disney is responsible to pay the bonds not taxpayers outside the physical borders of RCID.
I do not care who replies to this post, I am not listening to you, LA, LA, LA, I CAN'T HEAR YOU, LA, LA, LA
There would be no legal way for Disney to be responsible for paying the bonds directly. They either stay with RCID, possibly transfer to a newly created district or possibly they transfer to the counties. Dissolving a municipality cannot result in a single taxpayer having the burden of the municipality’s debt.
- They will simply create a new complaint special district to replace RCID; a district similar to RCID, but a modern one, compliant to the Florida constitution like all the current special districts; Disney giving up some power.
- Even if DCID is dissolved and there is no replacement, Disney is responsible to pay the bonds not taxpayers outside the physical borders of RCID.
I do not care who replies to this post, I am not listening to you, LA, LA, LA, I CAN'T HEAR YOU, LA, LA, LA
