News Reedy Creek Improvement District and the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District

VelocityRaptor

Active Member
Idk man, it sure seems like he's acting completely in line with what the Republican party has become. Would your opinion be different if you didn't live in Orange county? Or do you only care because the consequences are now personally effecting you?
I personally care because of my love for Disney. Disney is something that I care immensely about and the same for my friends and family. If I still lived in NY I would still care about this. You say this is what the Republican Party has become. Can I come back and say that the Democratic Party has now shifted even further left towards socialism in the past few years? I’m not here to discuss politics. Both parties are shifting more extreme. But that shift is leaving more and more voters stuck in the middle. Us from both sides of the aisle who don’t believe is the extreme political spectrum are being left in the dust.
 

JohnD

Well-Known Member
Again, I’m not a lawyer but I’ve got to think it’s a legal question to determine if the legislature can simply say that a provision that states a dissolution must be put to a vote locally simply does not apply in this situation. While this is being put through the legal system, RCID will continue.

That's a given. The bill has it dissolve June 30, 2023 if nothing is done. It's a matter now of what happens during the next year.
 

peter11435

Well-Known Member
A better analogy would be if Chick-fil-a didn't have to abide by state health inspections because they had a sweetheart deal with the legislature. Revoking that special privilege would be entirely legitimate.

The Reedy Creek Improvement District is corporate welfare. The Left used to believe in eliminating corporate welfare.
Except restaurants at WDW do have to abide by state health codes and inspections
 

MurphyJoe

Well-Known Member
Could that even happen? If Disney fights and wins wouldn't that undo everything?

No idea. I'd imagine it'd fall with how the debt is structured and Florida state law. Sounds more plausible than my idea of Disney buying a large tract of land in Georgia, then film their latest D+ reality game show, "Moving the Magic," where teams of the world's best industrial movers compete to relocate the Walt Disney World resort to its new location. I'm sure they could figure out a way to deduct the relocation production expenses from their taxes.
 

the_rich

Well-Known Member
I have three kids. Pretend I give each of them $20 per week as allowance. If one of my kids annoys me and I decide to eliminate her allowance, that's targeted punishment. But that isn't what's happening here.

What's happening here is that I currently give my favorite kid $40 per week as allowance just because I like her better than the others. I decide to revisit my allowance policy because it's unfair, so I cut the privileged kid to the same $20 that the other two kids get. This is merely leveling the playing field.
Yea its literally not the same thing.
 

Chip Chipperson

Well-Known Member
A better analogy would be if Chick-fil-a didn't have to abide by state health inspections because they had a sweetheart deal with the legislature. Revoking that special privilege would be entirely legitimate.

The Reedy Creek Improvement District is corporate welfare.

Except that WDW isn't exempt from any health or safety standards, so your example doesn't work.
 

CaptainAmerica

Well-Known Member
The District is not exempt from state regulations.
You can't have it both ways. In this thread, you have claimed:

1) Disney does not receive special benefits, whether financial or in the form of regulatory exemptions, AND;

2) Disney will be harmed by the dissolution of the RCID.

#1 and #2 can't both be true.

Except restaurants at WDW do have to abide by state health codes and inspections
Seven hells, it was an analogy applied to Chick-fil-a. Some very smart people on this board are pretending like they don't know how analogies work.
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
Interesting take. RCID dissolves so their bonds default and get passed to FL's taxpayers. Disney fights the action in court and wins due to comments made about the dissolution being retaliatory in nature. RCID reforms without the debt as it's been transferred due to the previous default.

This is why there is a timeline in the bill - its not immediate :)
 

peter11435

Well-Known Member
Disney might sue regardless. They should. Just tie it up in court for years until you get a more favorable set of people making the decisions.
They certainly will sue regarding the passing of this bill. Although it is more likely that it will be the district itself and other parties filing suit also.

My comment though was in reference to if the county singled them out for additional permit revenue
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Disney has taken losses at the hands of the government before. A notable instance is when, thanks to the governor of California, Disneyland couldn't open for over a year due to onerous COVID guidelines, despite an enormous lobbying effort by the company and allies.

Whether Disney comes out a winner or loser on this matter remains to be seen. There are too many variables, not the least of which is if it can withstand Constitutional muster.
Ultimately they would win this one.

Florida ham handed this (shocking)

It looks like they are voiding rules that they created for Disney after they took a stance against them on another issue.

Zero case was attempted to be made that thus benefited the residents of Florida. Why bother when it’s crap, right?

And longterm Florida would never win this…

You know what Disney could do? Pay everyone starting $25 an hour. Actually drive competition out of business when they always helped/benefited from it being there. That could lead to massive job losses/tax base issues.

Only two dogs in tourist Mecca have those kinda pockets
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom