News Reedy Creek Improvement District and the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District

[Sirwalterraleigh]

Honestly, it’s wise for Disney to stage its legal battles against these fools rather than the state. This is well out of the public eye and I’m sure their legal team is more than capable of taking on these morons.

From their meeting:
View attachment 707153

…there’s been no shortage of “fools” in all this…

There is shortage of 19 year olds from Wichita State to run the teacups, however…

…that’s a thing

 

[Zummi Gummi]

Well played, Disney. Exceedingly well played.

 

[drnilescrane]

The district is also not allowed to permit advertisements of any companies that compete with ones that operate within Reedy Creek, board members said.

“We lose control over everything other than to maintain the roads and maintain the infrastructure,” one board member said.

Particular focus was paid to one section that board members said locked in development rights of a particular parcel until 21 years after the death of the youngest current descendant of King Charles, or until Disney abandons the resort.

Source: https://www.wftv.com/news/local/pow...XFYXTOFKKQMLXY/?taid=642483accb00fe0001d94b76

 

[Parker in NYC]

Can I say I told you so... In a nother vlog site I been saying this could cost Disney billions... I said they ( a rubber stamp from the new board) could pull eminent domain on undeveloped land, start out by saying it for a new roads for traffic from off property like over near AK lodge then sell the area beside to road for development under fair value clause and before Disney knows it a strip mall or worst could be across the road to the AK area...

For real?!

 

[castlecake2.0]

For real?!

I think Disney was real strategic with how they developed that end of the property to stop anything like that from ever happening.

 

[Sirwalterraleigh]

Can I say I told you so... In a nother vlog site I been saying this could cost Disney billions... I said they ( a rubber stamp from the new board) could pull eminent domain on undeveloped land, start out by saying it for a new roads for traffic from off property like over near AK lodge then sell the area beside to road for development under fair value clause and before Disney knows it a strip mall or worst could be across the road to the AK area...

If you’re saying the destruction of reedy creek is a fundamental disaster on many levels that the Disney fandom is underplaying to “coo themselves to sleep”…

…then…yeah…I’m down

 

[Parker in NYC]

If you’re saying the destruction of reedy creek is a fundamental disaster on many levels that the Disney fandom is underplaying to “coo themselves to sleep”…

…then…yeah…I’m down

If the world starts seeping into the boundaries of WDW, our Disneyland friends will feel right at home.

 

[trainplane3]

Full article on it:

DeSantis’ Reedy Creek board says Disney stripped its power

LAKE BUENA VISTA — Gov. Ron DeSantis’ handpicked board overseeing Disney World’s government services is gearing up for a potential legal battle over a 30-year development agreement they…

www.orlandosentinel.com

I may not understand much legal stuff but this is just really funny to me.

 

[Dranth]

Well, with this coming out, now I wonder if they were ready to take it to court but didn't bother once they were able to push through the deal with the district. No need to sue if the state is taking over something that has no power over you. We'll see as more information comes out but it really makes the state look like even bigger fools if this is true.

 

[flyakite]

Here on the RCID website is the contract. Go to page 367

https://www.rcid.org/document/1-25-23-rcid-bos-package/

 

[Disstevefan1]

This is what the WESH reporter said on television during his newscast:

THE AGREEMENTS WERE MADE IN THE WEEKS RIGHT BEFORE MEMBERS WERE REPLACED BY THE PEOPLE PICKED BY GOVERNOR RON DESANTIS BECAUSE OF THE NEW LAW PASSED LAST YEAR. BOTTOM LINE, THE AGREEMENTS PUT DISNEY IN CHARGE OF ALMOST ALL DECISIONS ON THE TERRITORY IN REEDY CREEK FOR THE NEXT 30 YEARS AND THERE IS NOTHING THAT THE BOARD CAN DO ABOUT

Why only 30? Why not 100 or 200 years?
This way the technology will eventually exist to safely thaw Walt's head, clone him a new body then he can reclaim control of his company!

 

[flyakite]

The next meeting in February finalized contract. All out in open as a public meeting.

https://www.rcid.org/document/4783/

 

[Surferboy567]

A couple of questions:

1.) How can the board use Disney’s money? They aren’t part of the company so how can they use company money?

2.) Doesn’t Disney still own the land?

 

[peter11435]

A couple of questions:

1.) How can the board use Disney’s money? They aren’t part of the company so how can they use company money?

2.) Doesn’t Disney still own the land?

1. Where does the district get nearly all of its money from?

2. Disney owns the vast majority of the land.

 

[Minthorne]

Sounds like the Disney board members salted the fields on their way out... and the new District wants to attack that immediately as it was specifically setup to usurp them.

It was codename Project Mouse Droppings

 

[lazyboy97o]

How did they not know about this? Can a company sue…itself? How does something like that even work?

Disney and the Reedy Creek Improvement District were never one and the same. The two could have always entered into litigation against one another because they were district legal entities.

 

[Surferboy567]

1. Where does the district get nearly all of its money from?

2. Disney owns the vast majority of the land.

Disney and the Reedy Creek Improvement District were never one and the same. The two could have always entered into litigation against one another because they were district legal entities.

Got it, thanks this helps me understand some background.

 

[Figgy1]

A couple of questions:

1.) How can the board use Disney’s money? They aren’t part of the company so how can they use company money?

2.) Doesn’t Disney still own the land?

The board taxes Disney
Disney owns Disney's land and RC owns slivers across property

 

[lazyboy97o]

Well, with this coming out, now I wonder if they were ready to take it to court but didn't bother once they were able to push through the deal with the district. No need to sue if the state is taking over something that has no power over you. We'll see as more information comes out but it really makes the state look like even bigger fools if this is true.

This doesn’t fully prevent the Board from interfering. It protects a lot but not everything.

 

[castlecake2.0]

Isn’t that the point of the district?