Disney world, no contest.
Oops thanks I didn't catch that. Hummm I deleted my answer, that's a bit harderThe comparison was strictly DL vs MK as parks, not the overall resorts.
It STUNS me that Fantasyland seems to be ahead of Tomorrowland for a rework at Disneyland. Although at this very moment I wouldn't expect either of them to actually get real attention any time soon.DL. Although it looses points for the stagnant lost potential in Tomorrowland.
Disneyland, despite the unforgivable absence of a PeopleMover.
DL's Rivers of America are nicer and more scenic. Pirates of the Caribbean is much more epic at DL than at MK. New Orleans Square > Liberty Square, although both are amazing. DL's quick service is miles better and has more options to choose from. DL has Indiana Jones in its Adventureland rather than Flying Carpets. DL's train ride goes through Jurassic Park and the Grand Canyon while MK's train ride goes through weeds. DL's Fantasyland and Main Street are more charming. Overall, the park is just more well-maintained. It's able to do more refurbishments and updates since it's primary a locals' park (for instance, DL's BTMR got the dynamite scene that MK's BTMR will never get).
MK is great in its own right, though. It should be factored in that MK shares attractions with three other parks while DL only shares attractions with one other park. Also, I don't think MK is necessarily in direct competition with DL. Disneyland Park is truly the pinnacle of theme parks in the United States while Magic Kingdom is just a portion of a larger vacation that includes experiences you can't get in Anaheim.
Even with an inferior Tomorrowland, I still went with Disneyland. Probably because of the density of attractions, the better weather, Indiana Jones, and just a certain intangible factor.
I have not experienced Galaxy's Edge at Disney World, but I love the integration into the park at Disneyland. The site-lines are maintained so that you can only see the spires where they make sense, you can't see the remainder of the park within the land, and the transition into the area really sells the sense that you've entered a different world.
It's a tough one and I have trouble giving a solid all-around answer. They're very different parks with a lot of different rides. The "same" lands from one park to the other are pretty different with some lands that are completely different (different names, different themes, different rides altogether). And even the rides that are the same from MK to DL are anywhere from somewhat different to very different. Also - and this gets skipped over a lot - the restaurants are completely different.
I know a lot of people like to compare these two parks but they're really apples to oranges. I'll put it this way: you could never say, "Oh, I've been to Magic Kingdom before, so I don't need to go to Disneyland." Or vice versa. They're too different. I mean, one of them has an entire Galaxy's Edge now. That alone helps push them even farther apart in terms of a comparison if you're talking strictly those two parks and not DL vs WDW offerings.
In the end, if I could only ever go to one of them for the rest of my life, it would be Magic Kingdom but a big part of that is because I grew up going there and it carries a huge nostalgia factor for me. BUT if you told me I could go to Magic Kingdom every year for the rest of my life but never go to Disneyland again, I'd be pretty sad because I'd be missing out on a lot.
I've been going to WDW since I was 8 weeks old (now mid-30s) and have gone to Disneyland twice in the past two years, along with trips to WDW. I was not prepared for how different Disneyland was. I absolutely love it and hope to keep going back every year because it's just a different park than Magic Kingdom.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.