BrianLo
Well-Known Member
I don’t think this is temporary. I also expect Rat will join G+ (it’s new, but it’s not actually that low capacity and the sheen should wear off soon enough).
Genie Plus is marketed on the premise that a guest needs to be able to book AT LEAST 3 useful Lightening Lane a day. With low friction. Regardless of my personal experiences with the system, I can conclude easily from here that isn’t the case.
If you can’t book three based on how they’ve priced the product(s), it’s a rip off. I’m sure they even have data now that satisfaction is contingent on four.
Walt Disney Worlds biggest issue is capacity. Why anyone thought removing two of the most valuable attractions from each park and selling an iteration of their ride skip with less options than previously would be looked on favorably, is beyond me. Maybe they didn’t anticipate so much uptake. The biggest reason so many posters hate this is because of capacity. If there was no ILL I’d imagine significantly less dissatisfaction.
That said, I actually don’t think ILL is terrible if limited to one per park. There’s going to be less complaints about someone buying G+ with the expectation they can have the most popular attraction (only for it to sell out), versus not allowing them to specifically buy that a la carte option (because it is sold out).
Heck, G+ Might actually be worth it for Epcot eventually. It’s still not for AK.
Genie Plus is marketed on the premise that a guest needs to be able to book AT LEAST 3 useful Lightening Lane a day. With low friction. Regardless of my personal experiences with the system, I can conclude easily from here that isn’t the case.
If you can’t book three based on how they’ve priced the product(s), it’s a rip off. I’m sure they even have data now that satisfaction is contingent on four.
Walt Disney Worlds biggest issue is capacity. Why anyone thought removing two of the most valuable attractions from each park and selling an iteration of their ride skip with less options than previously would be looked on favorably, is beyond me. Maybe they didn’t anticipate so much uptake. The biggest reason so many posters hate this is because of capacity. If there was no ILL I’d imagine significantly less dissatisfaction.
That said, I actually don’t think ILL is terrible if limited to one per park. There’s going to be less complaints about someone buying G+ with the expectation they can have the most popular attraction (only for it to sell out), versus not allowing them to specifically buy that a la carte option (because it is sold out).
Heck, G+ Might actually be worth it for Epcot eventually. It’s still not for AK.