Now you're misinterpreting my point by taking my reply in a different direction than the intent of my original post. Disney has a finite number of seats and high demand. Would Disney prefer those seats be distributed among as many unique people as possible (fewer re-riders) or fewer unique people (more re-riders)? It is my position Disney would rather the former situation happen more frequently than the latter, so they can satisfy more unique guests. However, Disney will be friendly to re-rides if guests buy those additional rides by some means (but not so friendly you can buy multiple on the same day). VIP Tours are the extreme version of the pay for multiple rides situation. If you make this into what individuals can theoretically do, then that is missing the point of what Disney would prefer to happen.
Yes, you can, so far, always decide to wait in standby as many times as you want, but in *practice* few people would choose to stand in the same 90+ minute line multiple times. There is an element of self-regulation, so from Disney's perspective the impact is minimized, and they can ignore it... for now. However, when Rise opened there were quite a few people who posted "check my itinerary" type posts and they would have 2 or 3 days starting at DHS for Rise BGs with the plan to hop elsewhere. Or with FP+ start in a park twice and pick the same set of rides, with a plan to hop before lunch. My out-of-state AP people on my F&F list would do this all the time, I'm guessing they weren't alone. FOP, SDMT, SDD (or previously TSMM)... multiple days worth of reservations and play Epcot by ear or utilize refresh, refresh, refresh in the other park. I am also saying Disney has a preference for guests not to tour this way. Disney's preference would be for guests to forgo the "drive-by" park hop, only consuming space on high demand attractions, freeing up incremental capacity for a unique guest intending to spend a full day in that park. Yes, it means that guests will be selecting alternate things in the park they spend all day in, but those attractions might have less pressure on them than the ones that they have foregone, or maybe a guest decides to sleep in instead, since they were fine arriving at Park 2 like by 11AM anyway. Disney's preference for park hoppers is they eat, shop, do attractions that aren't already overly crowded which means later in the day, not earlier. Disney wants park hopping to fill underutilized spaces, not so a fraction of guests can consume even more high demand spaces in their day.
With the reservation and park hopping restriction, the calculus for guests is different. If you decide you want to hit a couple AK rides, or DHS rides a 2nd or 3rd time at opening in an attempt to minimize your wait times, the cost isn't monetary but in your itinerary, you can't go somewhere else until 2PM. Which can deter people from doing that entirely because they don't want to spend 5 hrs in Park 1 on a 2nd or 3rd day, and/or waiting until 2PM isn't enough time in Park 2. So they will do it less, freeing up a little capacity. Likely at least as much as Disney freed up by stopping parents utilizing child swap to get more of their kids re-rides (another way Disney restricted re-rides spilled over to affecting vacationers and not just locals, which was my original point). Guests have proven to be incredibly imaginative at figuring out how to get re-rides while minimizing their waits, but that doesn't mean that an individual's success at accomplishing it means that Disney wants that to happen.