I'm definitely a person who likes to take my time, I just have also shotgunned the parks hitting only the big stuff and the difference between them in terms of time sink using that approach is only super apparent with MK.All depends on how you experience the parks too. The seas can be 10 minutes of waiting and riding the Nemo ride or it can be 60+ minutes experiencing the aquarium, watching a dolphin presentation, turtle talk, etc.
I’ve also been told the number of attractions I’ve experienced is “near impossible” without LL and yet I did it without even trying haha.
OLC/Tokyo Disneyland manages to maintain this mindset.Why can't nostalgia and new coexist--- WDW certainly has the space for both
Let me just throw this out there--one of the reasons DCA's Carsland is so detailed and complete is because John Lasseter protected the project through development. I'm not sure the WDW version would have the same level of theming without a very high up exec walking the project through from start to finish and insisting that the project have few, if any, cuts based on cost.
If every park was operated by them, the world would be better. It's been an ongoing trend that other companies/creative seem to know what do do with Disney IP better than Disney currently does.OLC/Tokyo Disneyland manages to maintain this mindset.
Other side of DS. Plus, that's a restaurant and (larger?)Next to the paddle boat that is already there?
Are you suggesting 20 million people were spending upwards of $200 per person to take photos of the Castle?It's a great time to travel internationally. Doesn't really have anything to do with the content of the park. Unless you're suggesting they are just tired of the quintessential Disney experience, and we DO need to look at replacing the castle.
Muppets is more beloved by 20-40 demo than the Simpsons?Muppets is definitely more beloved by the 20-40 year old demo, which is why that one has more negative opinions among guests and the internet atm
Richard will almost certainly be joining Joe in the big river in the sky. It makes no sense to put up with the maintenanceThe Riverboat is going away totally, not being docked. There's no place to dock it if they don't have any water.
The lock is there to maintain the water level in the park so that it’s not moving up and down and much as the larger system. The water management system can be altered and it is being altered to remove the Rivers of America. A buried culvert under ground would be able to maintain the connection. But even then, the water could be fully disconnected.Apparently the issue with this is the water needs to be connected to the canal around BTMRR.
I’d be all for it if it were feasible
There are detention ponds all over the place. They’re not filtered. Some have a fountain to keep the water moving.Yeah, Because the ROA at WDW is essentially a wild river attached to the lagoon that they have a dam(the lock)to drain it. As far as i understand it, if you cut it off from the lagoon, it's a stagnant pond with no significant enough infrastructure to filter it, treat it, move the water, etc. And a stagnant pond in the south is a non starter.
Paddlefish is definitely bigger. Probably more than twice the mass. I also don't even think it moves.Other side of DS. Plus, that's a restaurant and (larger?)
More beloved than Tom Sawyer Island and the boat, was what I was trying to say.Muppets is more beloved by 20-40 demo than the Simpsons?
The interesting thing about the MK argument is that EPCOT's most successful period ever was when it was essentially nothing like the MK. It eventually became outdated and attendance declined, but as they've tried to make it a bit more like the MK over the years with IP, it's never really made a huge difference or brought back the popularity it had in the early years, when it was almost equal with MK in attendance.
I think Disney is better off with the parks being distinct from one another -- but they all need enough to do. MK is a multi-day park right now if people want to do everything it offers; EPCOT is the only other park that's potentially in that category and even that feels like a stretch.
The interesting thing about the MK argument is that EPCOT's most successful period ever was when it was essentially nothing like the MK. It eventually became outdated and attendance declined, but as they've tried to make it a bit more like the MK over the years with IP, it's never really made a huge difference or brought back the popularity it had in the early years, when it was almost equal with MK in attendance.
I think Disney is better off with the parks being distinct from one another -- but they all need enough to do. MK is a multi-day park right now if people want to do everything it offers; EPCOT is the only other park that's potentially in that category and even that feels like a stretch.
I think Epcot would be rather successful if they tied an aliens lane and planet of the apes lane since Disney has 20th century in their portfolio now.
I think if you made Epcot a sci fi themed land with aliens, planet of the apes, maybe throw in a replica of wakanda in there…I think that would be rather fruitful for Epcot.
If disney were super smart they would try to figure out how to acquire the dune and blade runner ip as well.
Practically speaking, this sounds significantly more expensive to complete and regularly maintain than what Disneyland did to readjust their river, no? And that’s not even factoring in current interest rates for initial construction contracts.The lock is there to maintain the water level in the park so that it’s not moving up and down and much as the larger system. The water management system can be altered and it is being altered to remove the Rivers of America. A buried culvert under ground would be able to maintain the connection. But even then, the water could be fully disconnected.
There are detention ponds all over the place. They’re not filtered. Some have a fountain to keep the water moving.
Then they should be building a steel coaster there.But its not about being 'stupid', its about Disney building its parks for the majority.
Id be all for some more fountains, but all that sounds like redoing the infrastructure anyway without solving the crowd flow issues or the issue of resurfacing the riverbed. And throwing random fountains in the RoA between the island and frontierland doesn't exactly seem like a really cohesive option.Richard will almost certainly be joining Joe in the big river in the sky. It makes no sense to put up with the maintenance
The lock is there to maintain the water level in the park so that it’s not moving up and down and much as the larger system. The water management system can be altered and it is being altered to remove the Rivers of America. A buried culvert under ground would be able to maintain the connection. But even then, the water could be fully disconnected.
There are detention ponds all over the place. They’re not filtered. Some have a fountain to keep the water moving.
Prior to the current hub, Cinderella Castle having trees help give the park more personality and its own identity. The trees even managed to hide the parade floats that ran across the park during the day and evening hours.When they changed the castle hub to the current version, the park lost some serenity/aesthetics, but that will seem incredibly minor to the whole riverfront disappearing.
Ah gotcha. Yeah no question. I thought the comparison was to The Simpsons.More beloved than Tom Sawyer Island and the boat, was what I was trying to say.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.