EPCOT 'Awesome Planet' coming to The Land pavilion

aladdin2007

Well-Known Member
I am glad this is happening, and a new film within this venue will be welcome.

Just please keep those fantastic carpeted walls in the entranceway / waiting area.
Those walls are works of art...and one of the last remaining 'EPCOT Center murals' left!

-

I agree, though still not a fan of the generic title, but oh well right.
 

prberk

Well-Known Member
Could they have come up with a more sophisticated title than “awesome planet” sounds like something for 90s kids

Or how about just let "awesome" mean "awesome" and thus timeless? I get the overuse in the '90s, but it still means "awesome" -- unlike "lit" and "woke". So, I like the name OK. It's not trendy or IP. Just "awesome"! :)
 

prberk

Well-Known Member
I have zero clue. And literally anyone could be chosen as its narrator as far as I'm concerned.

You know, it might even be time for Disney to go back to their classic ways, and simply use the best voiceover artist for the project, not a celebrity necessarily. Think how The Haunted Mansion and Pirates and Country Bear Jamboree would sound today if they had relied on celebrity voices of the era, rather than the "right" voices for the ride.
 

Brer Panther

Well-Known Member
You know, it might even be time for Disney to go back to their classic ways, and simply use the best voiceover artist for the project, not a celebrity necessarily. Think how The Haunted Mansion and Pirates and Country Bear Jamboree would sound today if they had relied on celebrity voices of the era, rather than the "right" voices for the ride.
This is a thing that I agree with. Very, very much. Disney's been doing this sort of thing with their movies and TV shows as well. I don't dislike the idea of celebrities doing voice acting in general (there are a lot of celebrities that are good at it), but there's such a thing as too much. Not everybody has a distinct voice that lends itself well to animation, and just because someone is a good live-action actor doesn't mean they're going to give a good voice performance. There was no point in casting Shakira as a character in Zootopia who barely has any screentime or lines, and does Disney really think somebody not in the target audience of Mickey and the Roadster Racers is going to watch it simply because it's got Jay Leno voicing a recurring character?

Of course, with theme park attractions there doesn't seem to be as much of a reliance on celebrities. I could be wrong, though.
 

prberk

Well-Known Member
This is a thing that I agree with. Very, very much. Disney's been doing this sort of thing with their movies and TV shows as well. I don't dislike the idea of celebrities doing voice acting in general (there are a lot of celebrities that are good at it), but there's such a thing as too much. Not everybody has a distinct voice that lends itself well to animation, and just because someone is a good live-action actor doesn't mean they're going to give a good voice performance. There was no point in casting Shakira as a character in Zootopia who barely has any screentime or lines, and does Disney really think somebody not in the target audience of Mickey and the Roadster Racers is going to watch it simply because it's got Jay Leno voicing a recurring character?

Of course, with theme park attractions there doesn't seem to be as much of a reliance on celebrities. I could be wrong, though.

I concur, I definitely concur. It is better to get a perfect voice over a celebrity. Occasionally you can have both, but its usually better to go with a mainstream unknown. This way the narrator's outside life doesn't overshadow their own attraction at all.

And that is exactly why I think that the theme park rides, which are meant to last decades, should have the right voices no matter whether the live actor is known as a celebrity or not. For how many years was Paul Frees' voice so familiar in the park before anyone except the truest geeks knew his name?

Same is really true for animation. Some voices in classic animation were known (Phil Harris in "Jungle Book" and Sebastian Cabot in "The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh"), but most others were not. Now even those names are lost to later generations, but their voices still work in the films, because they were the best choices for the characters -- not chosen for name recognition.

Disney is best when it goes for timelessness, not for current pop culture. Leave that to DreamWorks and others who go for the short-term gains at the expense of staying power.
 

Cmdr_Crimson

Well-Known Member
His successors have failed to leave up to that legacy. Lillard and Seacrest are terrible in those respective roles.
I still love the slap in face in Looney Tunes Back in Action...
What+is+the+from+_4454d22f5a2ce84b64a6a93d96e71ec4.jpg
 
Last edited:

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom