April 11, 2019. Investor day

Slpy3270

Well-Known Member
In short, not a bad presentation. Disney+ will probably need lots of improvement down the line, though, because to me it just looks like a Disney-fied Netflix, down to the interface.
 

CaptainAmerica

Premium Member
In short, not a bad presentation. Disney+ will probably need lots of improvement down the line, though, because to me it just looks like a Disney-fied Netflix, down to the interface.
That's exactly what it's supposed to be. The differentiator isn't the GUI, it's the content. Looking and feeling like Netflix is the whole point because customers will know how to use it comfortably right from launch. No learning curve, let the content speak for itself.
 

Slpy3270

Well-Known Member
Did anyone notice The Princess Bride as part of the Fox movie slate on Disney+? As far as I know, Disney/Fox only owns theatrical and TV rights (MGM has home video). I didn't know streaming was part of that package.
 

Cosmic Commando

Well-Known Member
I'm hoping the TV content includes stuff from the old Disney Afternoon ... And Gummi Bears. I want to introduce my kids to those shows...
Darkwing Duck, Tale Spin, Rescue Rangers, etc. would be perfect content for the service. When they said 5,000 episodes from Disney Channel, it really got my hopes up for older stuff. Hopefully, I'm not just underestimating the amount of schlock they've churned out in the last few years!
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
Darkwing Duck, Tale Spin, Rescue Rangers, etc. would be perfect content for the service. When they said 5,000 episodes from Disney Channel, it really got my hopes up for older stuff. Hopefully, I'm not just underestimating the amount of schlock they've churned out in the last few years!

Have you forgotten all those live action tween comedies and dramedies?
 

Slpy3270

Well-Known Member
I'm surprised that Batman '66 was left out entirely. That show (and its tie-in movie) is one of the crown jewels of the Fox library. It has a huge fan following, is attached to a major IP, and is seeped deeply in popular culture ("Holy X, Batman!", "To the Batcave/Batmobile!", "Same Bat-Time, Same Bat-Channel!", among many other quotables) despite lasting just three seasons.

I get that Warner Bros./DC owns Batman, but as far as I know Disney still has TV distribution rights and copyright to the whole series. One would think that would include streaming, and I don't think they have to consult with WB on it since WB doesn't own the series.
 
Last edited:

Disney Irish

Premium Member
I'm surprised that Batman '66 was left out entirely. That show (and its tie-in movie) is one of the crown jewels of the Fox library. It has a huge fan following, is attached to a major IP, and is seeped deeply in popular culture ("Holy X, Batman!", "To the Batcave/Batmobile!", "Same Bat-Time, Same Bat-Channel!", among many other quotables) despite lasting just three seasons.

I get that Warner Bros./DC owns Batman, but as far as I know Disney still has TV distribution rights and copyright to the whole series. One would think that would include streaming, and I don't think they have to consult with WB on it since WB doesn't own the series.

This is probably the reason why, note the lower left corner:

91kVtLzlFYL._SL1500_.jpg


WB/DC put out the whole series on DVD in 2014. Which means likely the Fox gave up their rights to the show. Plus there were a lot of other entities in the mix as well, its the reason why it took so long for the DVD to come out.
 

Slpy3270

Well-Known Member
This is probably the reason why, note the lower left corner:

91kVtLzlFYL._SL1500_.jpg


WB/DC put out the whole series on DVD in 2014. Which means likely the Fox gave up their rights to the show. Plus there were a lot of other entities in the mix as well, its the reason why it took so long for the DVD to come out.

They only have the home video rights. The show is still copyrighted to Fox, and they still own TV distribution rights, as far as I know. As for the other entities, Fox bought all those rights back thanks to Classic Media (they originally bought all the rights that William Dozier's estate had to the series and then tried to get Fox's share, but Fox turned the tables on them).
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
They only have the home video rights. The show is still copyrighted to Fox, and they still own TV distribution rights, as far as I know. As for the other entities, Fox bought all those rights back thanks to Classic Media (they originally bought all the rights that William Dozier's estate had to the series and then tried to get Fox's share, but Fox turned the tables on them).

Well the fact that it was only 5 years ago one has to assume that a new contract was signed between WB and Fox. And that Fox gave up some rights in lieu of licensing royalties so WB could be the distributor on record. So likely any contract would still be in place.
 

Slpy3270

Well-Known Member
Well the fact that it was only 5 years ago one has to assume that a new contract was signed between WB and Fox. And that Fox gave up some rights in lieu of licensing royalties so WB could be the distributor on record. So likely any contract would still be in place.

Here's the back of the cover. Notice the Fox logo on the bottom? And not to mention the program content copyright?
363704


Even if WB still owns home video and merchandising rights, they still don't have the show itself. In fact, current airings of the series still have the 20th TV vanity plate at the end, so I'm pretty sure Disney, through Fox, owns the series still. One has to assume they own streaming rights as well, unless we're told otherwise.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom