You are apparently trying to argue a point nobody is making. It is possible to hold two thoughts in one's head at once:
1) The ride makes you go "wheeeeee" and is fun
2) The ride is thematically wrong for Epcot, its price is far beyond its value, and its complete disregard for the design and sitelines of the park is an embarrassment
Continuing to post evidence of the former has no relation to the latter.
You're entitled to that opinion, no problem. However there have been several people who have only mainly posted negative things about this attraction. Your response that "the ride makes you go "wheeeee" and is fun" followed by three negatives makes me think you're not a big fan of it? That's fine but the mistake you're making is assuming you know everything I think about this ride and that I might not have more than one thought in my head about it. I'm a far more positive person than negative, that's just the way I am. I've already admitted that this attraction probably is in the wrong park, however as it's there now me complaining about it doesn't do anything to rectify that. So there you go, two thoughts in my head at once which I've spoken about earlier several times.
$400 million seems a lot of money, however I'm not a ride developer or manufacturer and as such have no idea about attraction costs. It's true that one can perhaps get quotes on previous attraction costs and then in one's mind estimate what you think an attraction like this should or shouldn't cost, I get that. Again however, without knowing the breakdown of the costs or what caused them to be high, it's an educated guess. People are more than entitled to talk about that (I've never said they're not contrary to some untruths posted about that), however others are entitled to post about their views on the costs that may differ in opinion, or ignore the costs if they so desire.
Another poster was heavily criticised for saying that 99% of the guests won't know or care about the costs, something I think is perfectly true and agree with. I understand the argument that perhaps more money spent on one thing may detract from spending on other things, however I'm guessing it's not as simple as saying let's not build Guardians and here's the $400 million we would spent to use on upgrading other attractions instead. I'm guessing some of that money would, could or should have been used for something else, but we'll never know for sure and are back to speculating albeit educated speculation. Again more than one thought in my head at once about this ride.
The way several people have posted their belief that 'it's fun', followed by huge posts about numerous negative opinions they have repeatedly makes me think that they're perhaps being too critical on this attraction and looking for faults in it? Perhaps they're not but that's the way it comes across. If saying one sentence about it being a solid addition followed by 30 sentences about everything they think is wrong with it is how some people feel about it then fair enough, some of us however have differing views and want to express them. I probably do the opposite and concentrate on the positives rather than the negatives. It's called trying to add balance among the frequent negativity and whilst I'm honest in my posts, I get some might see me as backing Disney too much. Some have catchy little names for those in either side of the debate, that's a bit of fun that I lose no sleep over. However for all the jokes about "It's just a coaster in a box" which caught on quickly by those not rating this attraction, it's odd how some don't like jokey comments against those so much when aimed towards the more negative. It's just about opinions really but as much as there's those on here deemed 'too positive' about this attraction (myself included there), in my humble opinion there's some who are far too negative. That's not everyone who posts a negative opinion, just some individuals. They're entitled to do just that as are those who want to express their positivity are entitled to do that. Nobody on either side is shutting anybody down despite numerous claims to the contrary made by more than one.