GoofGoof
Premium Member
Good. We can move on from the everyone stays at dog hotels anyway discussion.I get that.. and I agree with Disney letting people switch right now.
Let’s say people don’t travel outside of Disney hotels, fine. But let’s use an example of The Four Seasons at Disney World. Not Disney owned, but obviously people go there to visit Disney.
Here’s their main page. btw-I’m not arguing, I’m just trying to show that this isn’t going to be the problem that most people appear to think it will be.
View attachment 239477
Nothing about pets, right?
So let’s check the bottom of the page..
View attachment 239478
Nothing about pets jumped out.. we’re planning our vacation.. so let’s keep reading about the amenities..
View attachment 239479
View attachment 239480
Nothing anywhere about pets.
Now, I want to travel with my dog (hypothetically), so I’m going to keep looking.. let me check the FAQs..
View attachment 239481
And there it finally was.. in the FAQs. A description consisting of 3 short sentences.
I have to believe that the great majority of travelers are never even checking for that, and that’s why they don’t notice.
Disney being a “omg something changed!!!” type of place has everyone up in arms. I just hope the ones writing letters and calling to complain about this policy stop for a moment and think first.
I agree it’s basically hidden in most places. Hotel chains don’t really want the average person to know they accept dogs (see reaction here for reason why) but they know the pet parent type dog owners will know where to go. They are most likely getting the info from a pet travel page anyway. The only reason I think Disney needs to do a better job specifying the exact policy upfront when booking is because people are so obsessive about the place. Disney people are not always rational and the ones that are get forced to act somewhat irrationally when you book ADRs at 6 months and ride reservations 60 days out and so on. Disney is a different animal and people act different towards it.
They also probably need a policy that’s a little more restrictive than most other places. Disney is notorious for having guests abuse things and seek out loopholes. There’s the well documented abuse of GAC or chips in drink cups or fingerprint scanners for multi-day and AP tickets or people parking at resorts or Disney Springs to beat the parking fees or the recent issues with FP+ reservation abuse...I could go on but you get the idea. The online fan community makes this type of abuse worse with sites offering advice on how to beat the system as soon as rules are set. Disney needs to have a more solid, well laid out plan than the Four Seasons or even Loews Universal. This plan has some flaws that are obvious to me. It’s only a pilot so maybe the plan is to adjust as they see reaction.