Search results

I think he was saying it’s not acceptable but it is understandable. I don’t think it’s either.

Everyone understands. Just shorthand.

Anything is possible. I think Disney wanted to go beyond just requiring documentation and restricting who would get DAS as opposed to a different accommodation.

Just a note that people here can't know what's legally mandated as far as line accommodations or documentation requests because those issues have not been determined by the ADA or court cases.

The problem here needs to be addressed analytically; feeling bad isn't going to solve anything. I'm frustrated because much of what has been said here about the ADA requirements is not true - it's nothing more than wishful thinking which helps nothing. Maybe it's the frustration that sounds...

Can you provide a source for this?

That is a very real possibility.

What lesson should they have learned? The GAC system was abused because it was overly generous. That’s according to the evidence in the A.L. case. Now DAS is being abused for the same reason. I guess you can say they should have learned their lesson and moved everyone into standby after the...

For the new guy.

See, now you know that posters here are taking the matter seriously and respectfully and certainly don’t need to hear, “How dare we disabled people get in the way of anyone else’s fun?” That adds nothing of value to the discussion.

So I’m guessing you didn’t read the thread.

Right, but then they’re following Disney’s business model of either standing in lines or paying to avoid them.

It might be more sensible for you to read through the thread instead of asking people to start over.

So that means what for Disney though. Clearly line accommodations are not simple or easy and reasonableness needs to be addressed in terms of their impact on Disney’s business, which is considerable.

I think the confusion comes in with thinking that DAS = disability accommodation. DAS is just Disney's system, which may have given some people more accommodation than they actually needed, even the person whose condition has worsened.

How would a grand jury ever get involved in an ADA complaint? Or a regular jury for that matter.

This is true but denial of DAS is not a basis for complaint. They have to be denied a reasonable accommodation for their medical issue.

It’s a change.org petition. Interesting bunch of petitions to be found there.

Gee can you provide the link I’d like to know the source and how many people signed it.

The ADA doesn't require a business to eliminate all discomfort or difficulty; the caselaw recognizes that this would be an unreasonable requirement. I'm not sure if anything else you said differs from what I wrote. I don't think Disney is looking for ideas on how to fix their system. They...