Search results

I don't think it's very good if you go to zoos to look at children.

You don't go to a zoo to see humans and how they live though.

I so hope for the same, Indy ride, great, Indy land, great, but not in Animal Kingdom, and defined not replacing Dinosaur(the rest of Dinoland I could see go).

It certainly hasn't been confirmed, it's really a rumour that has been talked a lot about, but has little credibility.

For a brand new Animal Kingdom land, I would suggest a land based on the desert, either just deserts in general, or a large expansion to Africa about the Sahara in particular.

For me, the ideal solution is to keep Dinoland, just replace Dino-rama with another ride, such as The Excavator, then for Indy to go in Hollywood Studios or Adventureland.

Well of course not, I was only talking about the one ride; however, I don't think anyone cares that much about the rest of the land, people would be completely satisfied by having just an Indiana Jones Adventure(hopefully not the exact same as the one in California).

I think Indy would look great in Hollywood Studios; but let's say it wouldn't, the place that's joint in the 'best place to house Indy' contest in Adventureland, not Animal Kingdom.

Dinosaur look really expensive, and very well themed, it's Dino-rama which they must have though: "We don't have the money right now, just shove something in quickly, and we'll replace it when we got da moolah."

I always thought Pandora was going to be great, and it was - but Avatar is about conservation and respecting nature, so I think we all knew it would turn out amazing, as we all knew it would be themed to fit Animal Kingdom. Whereas with Indy, the film does have a few animals in, and is set...

I think people are only thinking about aesthetics when deciding if Indy would fit, but surely the main priority is theme. I agree that Indy would look good aesthetically in Animal Kingdom, but the theme is where the problem is at.

Could you not put it between Pirates of the Caribbean and Splash Mountain?

Have you actually been on Dinosaur?

Wait times do get to around 50+ at the peak during the day in summer, but it's always easy to get on before 10:00 and after 18:00 or 19:00 - it is of course less during off-peak times of the year.

I do agree that Indiana Jones Adventure is more popular than Dinosaur, but Dinosaur is still very popular, and it just wouldn't be worth the money to retheme it to Indy for the small amount of popularity it would gain. Why would you not close a less popular attraction, if you must add Indy to...

Indeed.

If Mystic Manor was put in Magic Kingdom, it would be put in a new miniland, like in Hong Kong, which would probably either be on the Rivers of America(past Big Thunder) or on a new extension, past Fantasyland, on the north east of the park. It isn't about being adventurous(though that is how...

I don't think it would attract any more people than Dinoland(after the initial 'newness' has gone at least, and just that popularity, which will only last a year or so, will cost a lot, a bit too much). I mean, you swap Dinosaur for what is basically the same ride(just one that isn't...

I don't think Indy fits in Animal Kingdom, I can see how you might, but I certainly can't think how on Earth you think Mystic Manor fits... Surely Mystic Manor could only ever fit in Magic Kingdom, it has absolutely nothing to do with nature, conservation, or real life(Indy has a little of real...

You have perfectly summed up what's wrong with a Indy land in Animal Kingdom.