What were the boards wrong about? That it lacks substance? That the land consists of a clone ride, an extra spinner for dumbo, a glorified M&G and a kiddie coaster that suffered major budget cuts? And probly the worst example of forced perspective to ever be created. They took 7 years to build all that?
Again, what were people wrong about? That Pandora was Igers knee jerk reaction to Potter at Uni? That he paid a butt load of money for an IP that nobody cared about? They did a good job with FoP and I dont recall people complaining about it besides a few references to Soarin. Is NRJ not a bust?
All of what I said above does not mean either land is a "failure". I dont see people saying Pandora, NFL or SWGE is a failure. The only thing I have seen in this thread is people pointing out low crowd levels and Disney missing the ball on a few decisions for the land, and those people are immediately labelled as complainers and their words are twisted into claims of "failure". The people who complain about the complainers are for the most part the same people who often defend the brand at any cost. Same people who claimed crowds were low in summer because of people holding off until SWGE opens. Attendance didnt go up, so now the crowds are low because RoTR isnt open yet, and oh ya, lets not forget the gorilla glue that holds their defense together...Dorian. The storm that wasnt even a threat when the land debuted and people would have already arrived for the opening.
