You mean they're bringing back the Power Rangers Street Show???My understanding is it's a much more short-term thing. Think about what they could throw into a park with just a few months of planning, that doesn't involve major construction or WDI.
You mean they're bringing back the Power Rangers Street Show???My understanding is it's a much more short-term thing. Think about what they could throw into a park with just a few months of planning, that doesn't involve major construction or WDI.
Those rumblings aren't remotely legitimate. IOA NEEDS a replacement for Lost Continent and could use one for Toon Lagoon, the Studios needs copious investment fast, and Universal has dramatically tightened it's belt and pulled back from investing anything at all. There are no projects announced for after EU, which is historically when you need to have new things opening in the preexisting parks to pull crowds. There is NO WAY Universal will give up a top notch IP it controls for next to nothing and get rid of one of the world's best attractions, all to create another area in which it needs to invest!There are legitimate rumblings that universal might want to change Superhero Island. I don't think it's smart to do so on their part, but if they do i think it opens a door in that contract.
Unless his opinion has changed a lot recently, Frank Oz has been pretty vocal with with regards to his disappointment in how Disney has handled the Muppets. I doubt he would come back for anything other than to sit on the sideline shaking his head in disbelief.
Villains has concept art and it's the kind of quick and easy character musical show the entertainment division can churn out quickly and often does.Just because we don't know details doesn't mean its not in development. We don't know much about the Bugs replacement either. Or Villains, which was just dumped on the Disney Parks Blog.
I don't need them to tell me everything 4 years out. I imagine we'll learn more at Destination D23 next year.
Those rumblings aren't remotely legitimate. IOA NEEDS a replacement for Lost Continent and could use one for Toon Lagoon, the Studios needs copious investment fast, and Universal has dramatically tightened it's belt and pulled back from investing anything at all. There are no projects announced for after EU, which is historically when you need to have new things opening in the preexisting parks to pull crowds. There is NO WAY Universal will give up a top notch IP it controls for next to nothing and get rid of one of the world's best attractions, all to create another area in which it needs to invest!
If that's too wordy - what possible benefit would Universal get from giving up Marvel?
I'm fairly sure both Ant-Man and Black Panther are off-limits in Florida.I agree I doubt Universal gives up the rights. But I think there is a way to make a Marvel area with some of the other heroes. Dr Strange, Ant-Man, Black Panther, etc.
That as well, they get around it with guardians. There are enough characters available to them that they could do it. But it would probably always feel lacking without spider-man,Ironman, etcI agree I doubt Universal gives up the rights. But I think there is a way to make a Marvel area with some of the other heroes. Dr Strange, Ant-Man, Black Panther, etc.
You mean they're bringing back the Power Rangers Street Show???
They can't use any characters associated with Avengers, Fantastic Four, X-Men, or Spider-Man. Guardians got through a very narrow loophole because the current team is made up of D-Listers and was created after the Universal contract.That as well, they get around it with guardians. There are enough characters available to them that they could do it. But it would probably always feel lacking without spider-man,Ironman, etc
For the right price they would.I agree I doubt Universal gives up the rights.
Hasn't Dr Strange appeared in the park though? And isn't there already fairly substantiated Wakanda rumors?They can't use any characters associated with Avengers, Fantastic Four, X-Men, or Spider-Man. Guardians got through a very narrow loophole because the current team is made up of D-Listers and was created after the Universal contract.
Strange is definitely on the table. He has done M&Gs (including Jollywood nights) and was featured in the nightly projection show for years.Hasn't Dr Strange appeared in the park though? And isn't there already fairly substantiated Wakanda rumors?
I have no legal knowledge of it so I'm not questioning you. I thought it was more specific than just being associated though. What I understood is it had to do with what comic you originally released the character in.
Mark my words: if Incredibles doesn't go to Animation Courtyard, its going to Star Tours.Here’s my opinion. With the space between star tours and SWGE filled, Star Tours fate has officially been solidified for some point in the future. It’s gotta go with how it’s not pulling its weight. Especially with another e ticket, it’s gonna pull even less in lighting lane.
That's why I said Ant-Man haha. Seems suited for it. New technology that lets you shrink and grow with him as you fly around. But I don't know if Ant Man is available.Mark my words: if Incredibles doesn't go to Animation Courtyard, its going to Star Tours.
Strange is definitely on the table. He has done M&Gs (including Jollywood nights) and was featured in the nightly projection show for years.
|
i. | East of The Mississippi - any other theme park is limited to using characters not currently being used by MCA at the time such other license is granted. [For purpose of this subsection and subsection iv, a character is “being used by MCA” if (x) it or another character of the same “family” (e.g., any member of THE FANTASTIC FOUR, THE AVENGERS or villains associated with a hero being used) is more than an incidental element of an attraction, is presented as a costumed character, or is more than an incidental element of the theming of a retail store or food facility; and, (y) in addition, if such character or another character from the same “family” is an element in any MCA marketing during the previous year. Any character who is only used as a costume character will not be considered to be “being used by MCA” unless it appears as more than an incidental element in MCA’s marketing.] |
People have the right to their opinion. I prefer not to judge people too harshly for having a different point of view, but to me hating everything about a brand but then spending large sums of money on their products anyway is a lot more weird than just loving a brand. I know some people here will say that makes them “real” fans but again…weird prospective. Even more weird to me are people who supposedly stopped going to WDW years ago because of the product but still post continuously on Disney fan boards.Uncritically “loving” a brand regardless of their behavior is weird… and terrible for the brand.
Hasn't Dr Strange appeared in the park though? And isn't there already fairly substantiated Wakanda rumors?
I have no legal knowledge of it so I'm not questioning you. I thought it was more specific than just being associated though. What I understood is it had to do with what comic you originally released the character in.
Who said anything about hating everything about a brand?People have the right to their opinion. I prefer not to judge people too harshly for having a different point of view, but to me hating everything about a brand but then spending large sums of money on their products anyway is a lot more weird than just loving a brand. I know some people here will say that makes them “real” fans but again…weird prospective. Even more weird to me are people who supposedly stopped going to WDW years ago because of the product but still post continuously on Disney fan boards.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.