• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

DAK 'Encanto' and 'Indiana Jones'-themed experiences at Animal Kingdom

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
Probably depends completely on where they are on developing the concept. If they don't have the concept fully developed, they cannot start construction (a guess not knowledgable). @lazyboy97o is much more well-versed on this than I ever will be.
Construction can start while design is still ongoing. It’s something that Disney often does and distorts the arguments about how long projects take.
 

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
Dinosaur is definitely not what I would consider "unpopular". It is typically not a rope dropped attraction and often has a short wait for a couple hours in the morning. But midday it is often at 30-45+ minutes and longer during peak times. It's not like it does not attract any guests, by far.
Ageree, we loved Dino. The good news is Indy will use the same ride system so it should still be a fun reskinned attraction.

IF they ever get it done.
 

Brer Oswald

Well-Known Member
They have also proven they can move fast when they want to. The ride system for Indy is in place, but I expect it to be more complicated than FEA and TBA.

Tron, Guardians, Remy's and Epcot spine were dreadful, but there were some outside factors for some of it (Covid, Reedy Creek, Fox acquisition, etc).

And you can't blame Cake Bake Shop which should have the 2025 signs soon.
I wouldn’t expect it to be more complicated than FEA, unless they extend the track.
 

SplashJacket

Well-Known Member
Was just about to say this. If dinosaur is operating with any wait at all, which it is, then it is already maximizing its capacity.
Technically true, but generally, if a ride is at a small wait, there’s very little incentive to increase throughput (single riders, faster operations, etc), and if there’s no wait, there’s room to decrease labor/vehicle counts to reduce maintenance costs while aligning with the demanded capacity.

So even if Dinosaur is at a 10 minute wait, while technically (since there’s any wait at all) its capacity is being fully utilized, in reality, it’s throughput could likely achieve a lot more if it was receiving a capacity push (as is common for the most demanded attractions).
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
You mean neck-and-neck between Disneyland's TWO parks and Walt Disney World's FOUR?

If DL adds a third park to the mix over there, I have no idea how WDW would ever manage to keep up!
Are you talking *attractions* or its subset: *rides*?

When it comes to rides, they're equal (give or take temporary closures or rethemes).

When it comes to attractions, WDW has a heck of a lot more.

But some people don't count shows, or zoos, or national pavilions, or films; they only care if the attraction moves them somehow.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom