The Spirited 11th Hour ...

wdisney9000

Truindenashendubapreser
Premium Member
Do you? Does anyone really anymore? Everyone outside of Imagineering has their opinions, which differ, so we should probably leave it at that.
The better question would be... what standard does Disney actually use these days? It seems (in WDW) they currently have 3 classifications:

1. Refurb.. (add track/theater)

2. Meet and Greet

3. Clone
 

Pumbas Nakasak

Heading for the great escape.
The better question would be... what standard does Disney actually use these days? It seems (in WDW) they currently have 3 classifications:

1. Refurb.. (add track/theater)

2. Meet and Greet

3. Clone
When you think of the target demographic its not surprising

1. Under 10's
2. Menopausal women
3. FanBoys with blogs and a fear of thrill rides but a love of dark places and moving machinery that simulates human movement.
 

Andrew C

You know what's funny?
The better question would be... what standard does Disney actually use these days? It seems (in WDW) they currently have 3 classifications:

1. Refurb.. (add track/theater)

2. Meet and Greet

3. Clone

Never miss an opportunity, eh?

The next time you run into an Imagineer, or someone higher up in operations, ask them about the e-ticket classification.
 

CaptainAmerica

Premium Member
These are experiences the whole family enjoys, unlike playing pretend with cardboard.
Look in the mirror friend, because you're part of the problem. The cynicism and arrogance of this post is unbelievable. You're in a make believe place called "Fantasyland" and you're too kewl to "play pretend with cardboard." Newsflash: You're not that cool. Maybe if you lighten up and participate instead of reacting with knee-jerk cynicism, you'd be able to enjoy those experiences that you consider so far beneath your contempt.
 
Last edited:

CaptainAmerica

Premium Member
Step two: Stop paying the executives in stock.
That's completely backwards.

What makes stock compensation valuable? Share price.
What causes higher share prices? Profits.
What causes profits? Revenue.
What is revenue? People giving you money.
Why would people give you money? You give them goods or services they need/want/desire.

Ergo, if you want the executives to "give the people what they want," then they should be paid even more heavily with incentive-based compensation. Now, we can quibble about the structure of stock compensation (longer vesting periods, segment-specific benchmarking, etc.), but an executive who makes a flat salary no matter what has absolutely no financial incentive to do ANYTHING good for the customer or for the business at large because he's going to "get his" no matter what.
 

PhotoDave219

Well-Known Member
That's completely backwards.

What makes stock compensation valuable? Share price.
What causes higher share prices? Profits.
What causes profits? Revenue.
What is revenue? People giving you money.
Why would people give you money? You give them goods or services they need/want/desire.

Ergo, if you want the executives to "give the people what they want," then they should be paid even more heavily with incentive-based compensation. Now, we can quibble about the structure of stock compensation (longer vesting periods, segment-specific benchmarking, etc.), but an executive who makes a flat salary no matter what has absolutely no financial incentive to do ANYTHING good for the customer or for the business at large because he's going to "get his" no matter what.

Fine then.

$1 salary. Do it for the love of the company.
 

WDWFan_Boston

Well-Known Member
Well they are crap if they couldn't come up with a better way to make the story interactive other than silly cardboard cut outs that you can make at home.

What should the masks be? Made of titanium and encrusted with diamonds and other precious stones? Seriously, sometimes Disney fans..... :facepalm:

Plus, for sanitation, do you really want to be putting your face in a mask that every sweaty tourist has put their face in that day?

I've been twice with my kids, and found the entire package to be an interesting and immersive experience that I'm not going to be even close to getting at my local Six Flags.
 

ford91exploder

Resident Curmudgeon
That's completely backwards.

What makes stock compensation valuable? Share price.
What causes higher share prices? Profits.
What causes profits? Revenue.
What is revenue? People giving you money.
Why would people give you money? You give them goods or services they need/want/desire.

Ergo, if you want the executives to "give the people what they want," then they should be paid even more heavily with incentive-based compensation. Now, we can quibble about the structure of stock compensation (longer vesting periods, segment-specific benchmarking, etc.), but an executive who makes a flat salary no matter what has absolutely no financial incentive to do ANYTHING good for the customer or for the business at large because he's going to "get his" no matter what.

The problem is more centered around 'short term incentives' many executive stock grants vest immediately so the motivation is to take short term actions which maximize IMMEDIATE value, Now if executive stock grants had a 5-7 year vesting period the motivation would be to push the company towards long term growth because being human they want the reward at the end of the tunnel.

Current american business practice is weighted almost entirely to short term gain. The CEO of Black Rock investments has been arguing that this is destroying long term value for shareholders and it's necessary to look at quarterly results more like a corporate EKG than basing rewards on quarterly results.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom