For example, a LOT of people seemed to agree that Vox, JDM and Vipraa did great in WEDCAR.
Yes, I agree with you. I'm just saying, you can't determine the "Top 3" nominations in a random process.
Well, sortof you can. Primary vote, if you will.
Everyone here gets to submit what they want (within a few limits, as are already set by the titles of the awards).
Those get added up (see what I did earlier). Top three from those move on to final voting.
Something like that.
Zweiland can nominate a shirt from the Workshop thread for best Art, but it may not make it. But, it's cool to nominate it anyhow! Make sense?
What I've already seen from running through the 6 who have submitted is that there is already some general consensus...and that is what we are going for.
It's not "random" as we have a limited set of data to start with...people who posted stuff in Imagineering either as solo or comp projects (not just chatter).
Hence why IDI doing what he's doing will help a LOT next year, because that dataset can be limited even better for the next time. Meaning, all comps you get in regardless.
Non-comps, if it's included, great, if not, you can bring it up to the appendix person to add it.
For example, bet you all forgot about my Hollywood Studios Love threads from years ago.
My work there was good enough that it's been picked up on some other imagineering forums (not our new friends, but others, who...with credit, borrows some of my ideas)
And I know I'm not alone there.