1. Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.You can use your Twitter or Facebook account to sign up, or register directly.
    Dismiss Notice

New Gondola Transportation

Discussion in 'WDW Parks News, Rumors and Current Events' started by danlb_2000, Feb 14, 2017.

  1. Slowjack

    Slowjack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2004
    Messages:
    1,069
    Likes Received:
    1,416
    There are multiple buildings being constructed in CBR in these permits. I thin you are referring to the elbow building in the NW section. There's a much larger building in the previously undeveloped SW section which presumably would be the CBR station.
     
    brb1006 and GoofGoof like this.
  2. peter11435

    peter11435 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Messages:
    6,753
    Likes Received:
    6,290
    Also you can definetely have a load point in the middle of the system. There are several examples of this around the world
     
    Sloan, brb1006, bcoachable and 4 others like this.
  3. monothingie

    monothingie OOOOWEEEEEEE! Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    Messages:
    2,892
    Likes Received:
    8,411
    The plans show the scope of work involves only Martinique and Barbados. Beyond that is purely speculation.
     
  4. TiggerDad

    TiggerDad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2016
    Messages:
    368
    Likes Received:
    768
    Good thing this whole thread is in the rumors section of the forum.
     
  5. monothingie

    monothingie OOOOWEEEEEEE! Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    Messages:
    2,892
    Likes Received:
    8,411
    Most areal systems are of the hub and spoke configurations. While you are correct there are examples of system which permit loading in the middle, because of the nature of such systems it tends to be inefficient leading to long waits escpecially if the system is busy. As for the building being built on the expansion pad it may serve the CBR, but given the size of the resort, it may problematic with guests being able to easily access it.
     
  6. monothingie

    monothingie OOOOWEEEEEEE! Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    Messages:
    2,892
    Likes Received:
    8,411
    A bus driver told me once that Speculation is not a Rummor.
     
  7. creathir

    creathir Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2015
    Messages:
    375
    Likes Received:
    710
    Very true, the placement is suspect, but the size of the structure near DHS is enormous. Look at it compared to the monorail station at Epcot.

    That is a very substantial structure for gondola loading/unloading.
     
  8. TheDude23

    TheDude23 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2015
    Messages:
    334
    Likes Received:
    1,061
    Is there a reason gondolas are the assumed guess? It seems widely unrealistic for a variety of reasons, but I guess you never know.
     
  9. MichWolv

    MichWolv Born Modest. Wore Off. Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2002
    Messages:
    17,230
    Likes Received:
    27,958
    Kudos on the Laugh In reference. Although it was sometimes followed by "...but stupid."
     
    brb1006 and ford91exploder like this.
  10. peter11435

    peter11435 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Messages:
    6,753
    Likes Received:
    6,290
    Those plans are not blueprints or siteplans for the entire project. They only show what is relevant related to the modifications to the watershed. Don't assume that Aruba and Jamaica will remain the same just because they were not on those plans.
     
  11. Rteetz

    Rteetz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2014
    Messages:
    2,503
    Likes Received:
    8,334
    I think its because of the shape of the buildings, specific orientation of the buildings, and putting pieces together that have led to the speculation of a Gondola.
     
  12. TiggerDad

    TiggerDad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2016
    Messages:
    368
    Likes Received:
    768
    we went through a lot of options over the past two days on the DHS Permits thread before arriving at this one.
     
  13. peter11435

    peter11435 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Messages:
    6,753
    Likes Received:
    6,290
    It would not decrease efficiency if the system uses detachable gondolas as it almost certainly would.
     
  14. GoofGoof

    GoofGoof Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2012
    Messages:
    9,350
    Likes Received:
    21,970
    Will the final plans for CBR include an increase in total resort capacity? I think it's obvious to everyone that WDW needs more hotel rooms and specifically more on the affordable side. It looks like in the plans so far they remove a bunch of existing rooms and replace with a taller building, possibly DVC related. If it's DVC that would be reducing the number of hotel rooms instead of increasing. If they replaced the rest of the resort rooms with similar taller buildings they could also increase hotel room capacity. The only issue would be having too many rooms in one place causing a transportation issue. Maybe this "system" solves some of the problem and with SW Land and possibly new additions to EPCOT shortly after it would directly connect to parks in high demand.
     
  15. monothingie

    monothingie OOOOWEEEEEEE! Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    Messages:
    2,892
    Likes Received:
    8,411
    Permits with site plans filed so far do not show any impact to those areas. Unless you are holding back on some insider knowledge your assessment is pure speculation. Just the same way I can say those are impact areas are going to be footers for monorail expansion.
     
  16. TiggerDad

    TiggerDad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2016
    Messages:
    368
    Likes Received:
    768
    What makes you think that newly built rooms with an aerial link to two resorts would fall into the "affordable" category?
     
    CanadianGordon likes this.
  17. peter11435

    peter11435 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Messages:
    6,753
    Likes Received:
    6,290
    Those permits you are referring to are not site plans and do not even show everything even within the areas covered. They are permits with SFWMD and represent modifications to the watershed only. They do not and are not meant to show everything that will be constructed or demolished in the area.
     
  18. monothingie

    monothingie OOOOWEEEEEEE! Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    Messages:
    2,892
    Likes Received:
    8,411
    Detachable Gondolas are standard fare. The tricky part is inserting and removing people in the middle. If my destination is at the middle stop but it isnt for others in the car we all must now stop at that point. Further I have a party of X waiting to board. There is no easy way to know which approaching car would have the capacity for my party. Hence the reason why most systems are Hub and spoke with no intermediary stop. It is simply easier and more efficient to implement.
     
    Last edited: Feb 14, 2017
    rfc0001 likes this.
  19. monothingie

    monothingie OOOOWEEEEEEE! Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    Messages:
    2,892
    Likes Received:
    8,411
    The attached schematic shows modifications being made. They are also quite clear to show additional structures being added throughout the resort. There is nothing being added to the section in question. Even though presumably given the land type it would have an impact on soil and water management. Again if you know something, and you're comfortable to release it please feel free to share it. PM me if you want to tell me if you can or can not.
     
  20. peter11435

    peter11435 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Messages:
    6,753
    Likes Received:
    6,290
    We will just have to wait and see...
     
    monothingie likes this.

Share This Page