I knew that, I meant more in a sense of if they were to build a new attraction like a Soarin type of ride (multiple theatres), or a Space Mountain type ride (2 sides/lines), would it better to have 2 entire attractions side by side. Picture two huge Space Mountains side by side, or 2 Soarin hangers like in Disneyland side by side. Im just using those 2 as examples. I know it would double the cost for an attraction, but I was asking if that could be a better system to deal with congestion. Many people seem to like the Dumbo system with the pagers, so if in the future they encorporated it on a larger scale and use a little imagination, it might be pretty cool to see two mountain size rides side by side with a themed area you stay within while waiting to be paged for your ride, (a land within a land), similliar to the way Storybook Circus is within Fantasy Land and has Dumbo. I'm not saying this the answer or that it is better than MM+. But if a ride like Mermaid costs appx. $100 million, it seems it wouldn't be outrageous to think it could fit in the budget to have 2 of them considering what NextGen has cost (so far). You would have plenty left over to build more attractions side by side and make it look cool. And no, I'm not saying i want side by side little mermaid attractions. Just an example. I dont hate NextGen or MM+ so please don't think that is what I'm saying and let slip the dogs of war upon me. Just curious if anyone else has similliar thoughts.