I would lean in this direction, flow is important and it might never be perfect but I think it also something to strive for. That does't mean a verne still discoverland can't flow into an optimistic tomorrowland but it would be harder to do
.
Yes that is a perfect example of flow, I think the Adventurelands into liberty square is another good one.A good example of flow (even though I've never been there) so take with a grain of salt is Tokyo DisneySEA
There is an architectural transition but it isn't one that's drastic or off-putting. If you were in the Mediterranean one might look across a sea and gaze at a mountain, or a volcano (pompeii)
Even though the storylines don't follow those -- it's a psychological advantage in theme park design that tricks you into thinking...okay...that makes sense.
Maybe we could make these maps -- that would be the 1 in the 1,2,3 read that Tom was talking about -- doesn't overwhelm the reader with a bunch of content -- but gives a concise presentation that introduces the reader to the lands, their flow, and their backstories
Agreed, this is an excellent short way to present. Even the proposals are very concise.. Look at the Swiss Epcot one.Maybe we could make these maps -- that would be the 1 in the 1,2,3 read that Tom was talking about -- doesn't overwhelm the reader with a bunch of content -- but gives a concise presentation that introduces the reader to the lands, their flow, and their backstories
Yes! Step by step and told as a story.
Oh dear this is old school, there is the Persian Hotel.Oh snap -- vintage!
I know! Monorail cutting through Tomorrowland and making a larger loop around too.
Ahh I love this image but at the same time the Magic kingdom looks so barren
Yeah very true.
