I don't.@marni1971 Do you know the difference, if any, between the tour tram and parking tram dimensions?
Alright, thanks for your input. So do you think it would have been feasible for them to be used in the parking lot? I know the turn at the far end of the tram lane is extremely tight, and there isn't any room to "go wide".I don't.
I do recall the trams having to snake around New York street to make certain corners. The turn from is now LMA, heading toward the skyscrapers, then turning right towards what is Premiere Theatre wasted space was particular bad. They had to swing all the way left before turning right. Originally the route was a left towards the side of the GMR where there was enough space to do a complete loop around. This lasted not long at all before the Sci Fi and Commissary kitchens started to be built.
Nah. I don't think the engines could take the constant strain and speed changes.Alright, thanks for your input. So do you think it would have been feasible for them to be used in the parking lot? I know the turn at the far end of the tram lane is extremely tight, and there isn't any room to "go wide".
I think you are correct in that assumption, By closing this ride they saved millions in operating expense I've seen this scenario played out too many times in corporate america some upper middle manager does not like a product/service - kills it and destroys the infrastructure so he cannot be second guessed.
This was known to happen frequently at Agilent (see the blog 'Bill and Dave are dead' no its NOT mine ) where products for which there was still significant demand for were EOL'd and production infrastructure shredded so managers could not be 'second guessed'.
So do you think it would have been feasible for them to be used in the parking lot?
Sharp turns and power requirements aside, I could see concern over having large doors along the length of the consist which open upwards and towards guests (who naturally tend to crowd the sides of the tram soon as it stops). You don't have the CM presence, to keep people corralled, out in the parking lots that existed at the Back Lot Tour loading platform.
Your right. If they ever tried to use them as parking lot trams some small child would get knocked down by the tram door and the lawsuits would begin. However, I do think the passenger cars could be repurposed. As an example, remember the tickets booths at Pleasure Island? Those were repurposed train cars form the old Fort Wilderness Train. I'd like to see WDW do something similar with a few of the old Backlot Tour trams.Sharp turns and power requirements aside, I could see concern over having large doors along the length of the consist which open upwards and towards guests (who naturally tend to crowd the sides of the tram soon as it stops). You don't have the CM presence, to keep people corralled, out in the parking lots that existed at the Back Lot Tour loading platform.
I had not even thought about that, but good point.It wouldn't be the first time we've seen something like this at Disney. Managers reportedly wanted to shutter 20,000 Leagues, and if the reports of not-so-serious damage to SpectroMagic are correct, that too is suspect.
Sharp turns and power requirements aside, I could see concern over having large doors along the length of the consist which open upwards and towards guests (who naturally tend to crowd the sides of the tram soon as it stops). You don't have the CM presence, to keep people corralled, out in the parking lots that existed at the Back Lot Tour loading platform.
So just complain about the complainers before any negative remarks have even been made? You take great offense to anybody using the word apologist, but your quick, unwarranted assumptions are acceptable?Then everyone would complain about the fact that they are using old worn out vehicles instead of spending the money to buy new modern ones.
So any decision the company makes is justifiable simply because, "they decided it"? Im not referring to the tram cars either. Im just asking if thats how you feel in general?No, it's paranoia, they wouldn't care if everyone in the world complained. They decided it was done, and it is done.
So just complain about the complainers before any negative remarks have even been made? You take great offense to anybody using the word apologist, but your quick, unwarranted assumptions are acceptable?
So any decision the company makes is justifiable simply because, "they decided it"? Im not referring to the tram cars either. Im just asking if thats how you feel in general?
I'm not sure that the back lot trams could make the turns that the parking trams require.
I'm not marni, but, the way the trams are designed, they well track in the same path as the tractor. Whatever turn the tractor can make the tram cars will just follow in the same footprint. It took me awhile to figure out how it did it, but, it does it with the precision of a ballet dancer.@marni1971 Do you know the difference, if any, between the tour tram and parking tram dimensions?
Seriously, do you realize what would have happened if they sold the Subs as is? There would be a number of fools that would attempt to use them as real submarines and the lawsuits would fly. Sometimes they have no choice but to just destroy what might be a hazard when out of it's intended element. Besides where would the market be for that many submarines. Maybe a third world country attempting to create their own Navy?This is the same company that let the 20K subs rot in a field so yeah, this isn't at all surprising. And considering how fast they got to work on the backlot after closing it down, I'd venture a guess it was a move to save the cost of operating the ride before the so called big makeover. I mean, why else has it been shut down since September 2014? It's now almost exactly 7 months later. Is costuming still full? Besides AFI, has ANYTHING been done there?
Seriously, do you realize what would have happened if they sold the Subs as is? There would be a number of fools that would attempt to use them as real submarines and the lawsuits would fly. Sometimes they have no choice but to just destroy what might be a hazard when out of it's intended element. Besides where would the market be for that many submarines. Maybe a third world country attempting to create their own Navy?
OK, let's see if I got this... If I try to explain why something happens, then I'm lecturing someone. If you, however, make comments that are targeted to the implying that Disney is a backwater, heartless company with no soul or foresight, then that is just logic. I'm I about correct on that? Why don't I just say what I want to say and you just say what you want to say and let the rest decide who they feel is correct? Would that work? Discussion only works when two or more are contributing. If it's just you, then that is lecturing. Look it up!Will you stop lecturing everyone? I'm just stating a fact. They dumped them. That's all. I wasn't getting on them or anything. You jump to their defense waaaay too much.
This is the same company that let the 20K subs rot in a field so yeah, this isn't at all surprising. And considering how fast they got to work on the backlot after closing it down, I'd venture a guess it was a move to save the cost of operating the ride before the so called big makeover. I mean, why else has it been shut down since September 2014? It's now almost exactly 7 months later.
Seriously, do you realize what would have happened if they sold the Subs as is? There would be a number of fools that would attempt to use them as real submarines and the lawsuits would fly.
I will assume that is some sort of counter-point. Solid!
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.