Main Street USA
Well-Known Member
Yeah, I didn't "invalidate your feelings." (psychology jargon) I had a different opinion than you, which is the exact thing you attempted to defend a few posts up.Alright, let me explain why you misinterpreted what I wrote. I was trying to say that it is unrealistic to say that if someone sees someone else win random prizes that there's no possibility for them to feel excluded. Of course the other side of this argument is that it's not logistically possible to include all the tons of poeple that come to the parks every day for a year to get these prizes. As a side note it is also naive to think that this "random ratio schedule" (psychology jargain) is completely altruistic. Sorry that you feel I took it personally, but I feel I have to stand up for the underdogs who read the stuff like what you wrote and then they don't wish to participate. By the way, I said the last statement jokingly. If you think that just because 60 or whatever number of poeple agree with you, you still aren't justified to invalidate other peoples' opinions. Don't worry you didn't "hurt my feelings".:kiss: No more time on this please.:hammer: Case in point: Don't tread on opinions, but respect them. It'll help you out in life.
I'm sorry you feel like you need to "stand up for the underdogs." In this case, you're on the (in my opinion) wrong side of things. Why? Because the people you are so nobly (or maybe not so nobly) "standing up for" are the people who are whining like 5 year olds because the person standing next to them won somehting and they didn't. If that's the argument you want to support and the group you want to hang with, go for it. I won't lose any sleep knowing the world has one more childish adult in it. That group is too big for one more to matter.
As for your life advice, I'll respect your opinion when you have a valid point. Until then, I'll continue to tear it apart with simple logic.