Disneyhead'71
Well-Known Member
Both Uni parks are younger than DHS and they both have more than 5 rides. You can shut down one ride in each park when there are 20 other rides for the paying customers to enjoy. When your park only has 6 rides total, and you start closing things, people are going to wonder why they are paying $100 to get in the place.I respect your style, you are trying to get known fairy dusters to openly admit the current shape of the park. You obviously don't care about being labeled as a troll, and you don't even acknowledge people saying such.
The thing you are failing to comprehend (or fully understand, you just set fires to see pandemonium from people not sipping from the same punch bowl you. yourself are emptying) is that, most disney fans, see the shuttering of attractions at dhs as a rebuilding process. We know full well that the value of the park is suffering, but, like many other parks, it will be reborn to be an amazing place and will become a lasting cherished memory it has been for many of us in the past. Part of progress is building. I remember going to uni (a place I know you are a fan of, you are the same person who claimed the Simpson's ride to be the most advanced attraction to date...righting off SpiderMan, and minions as old tech...even mocking people who claim small world is a classic in the process...though the simpsons ride orgins date back to the Back to the Future ride, which was a showcase 20+ years ago) during the potter build. It lacked, it was upsetting to not experience the uni parks fully. Seeing construction walls around Springfield really demolished the effect for me....that day. Upon returning, it was great. Potter is a mind blowing experience, the smallest details are done with a fine toothed comb. Krusty burger and duff gardens was fresh and new. It sparkeled. My last trip you could see things starting to show age, but, can you or I expect everything to withstand the amount of hands that are put on it? And to not experience the pretty dated, but wildly entertaining Jurassic Park because of the kong construction was something I wasn't prepared for.
Much like uni has been, dhs will regain the sparkle it once had. The rides will be awe-inspiring, and the detail will be exquisite once again. And then down the road, we will face a fence or gate making way to the next big thing...at all parks, no franchise is excluded from that.
I guess the real question is, why did you go to dhs, knowing the revamp it is currently getting, and expect it to be anything more than what others have said it was? And then you come expecting people to defend it as anything more than what it is...a rebuild. Not really the room to cast that kinda cloud. It will be an amazing park when it's done.
Who's fault is it that DHS is 25 years old and only has 5 rides? And your point is we doom and gloomers aren't patient enough?