In many threads here on the Imagineering section, it seems like most threads place most emphasis on the blue sky part of the Imagineering process when it comes to projects. And according to a video that was shown here, that is very important:
However, as the video rightly argues, the blue sky process is only part of the overall process. There are many other factors, of which I try to bring into play as much as possible. Chief among these, in my view, is constraints (i.e., physical space). However, it seems as though most people on these threads think that the blue sky part of the process is all that matters, nothing more. Not constraints, not funding, nothing but blue sky process. The person in the video shown did mention to take a moment to forget about constraints, but the key phrase is "take a moment", which means sooner or later, constraints will be important.
That's what this thread is about: namely, why it seems like I'm the only one who really does try to go beyond merely the blue sky process and see how anything I do would actually fit in the parks.
Oh, and no joking or sarcasm, please.
However, as the video rightly argues, the blue sky process is only part of the overall process. There are many other factors, of which I try to bring into play as much as possible. Chief among these, in my view, is constraints (i.e., physical space). However, it seems as though most people on these threads think that the blue sky part of the process is all that matters, nothing more. Not constraints, not funding, nothing but blue sky process. The person in the video shown did mention to take a moment to forget about constraints, but the key phrase is "take a moment", which means sooner or later, constraints will be important.
That's what this thread is about: namely, why it seems like I'm the only one who really does try to go beyond merely the blue sky process and see how anything I do would actually fit in the parks.
Oh, and no joking or sarcasm, please.