and through a damn instagram fuzz filter
There again, if the park moves away from a "Studio" park theme it could go anywhere...
Is that a hint?
Walt once said (when questioned why he put so much detail into Disneyland) something along the lines of "they may not think they notice, but if it's NOT there, they'll notice that".
I'm assuming it's referred to as "new" because Muppet Vision wasn't the first Muppet attraction at WDW. The show in the VotLM theatre was.
isnt that good? they know where to cut, where to unbolt..etc..
well,. there is a reason hipters and wanna-be photographers use instagram and real photographers use flickr (or other heavy content image servers)I too hate knowing that a higher resolution image exists behind these pixelated low res pieces of garbage that my sensitive eyeballs are exposed to on a daily basis here on the information superhighway. Here's what I do. First I make the 400x400 image in your example take up the entirety of the screen on my 55" adult film monitor. I then take a high res picture with a camera. Now, the next bit is a bit time consuming, but straightforward. Print out the picture on a poster presentation printer. I prefer a width of at least 4 feet and in your example the height would also be 4 feet. Then, I hire a group of graphic artists and we examine the color on each area of the image and begin to fill these sections in by hand with oil paints. Be careful! Posters can be pricey and you don't want to have to print it out again. Make sure that before you fill in a section with say a sky blue that you have agreed by majority vote that you've hit upon the correct color for that 0.025 mm^2 section of the poster image. Finally, take a 12 Megapixel picture if you so desire with your SLR, transfer to a computational device attached to a printing device (I prefer monks because I'm old school) print it out, and tape it to the computer monitor of your choice. You are now viewing a high res image!
Next you'll tell me it isn't a working studio anymore!
... Or the street could just look exactly like Imagineering planned from the beginning!
Well thank goodness the ride is dedicated to the history of film, not which legal entity owns which rights. Although again, most of the film segments represent films owned by TCM.
Disney may have wanted to compete with Universal when they broke ground for MGM, but they were planning an Epcot pavilion all around classic film before. Michael Eisner and Marty Sklar decided that there was enough ideas there that they should build a theme park, but Eisner was probably thinking lets compete with the theme park that's there to compete with WDW. I get what you're saying. Who cares who owns MGM now, Turner/Warner Bros/TCM owns the rights to the important MGM movies
