Movielover
Well-Known Member
My God that Tangled ride looks amazing! Ugh can the OLC please buy out the U.S. parks!
It was the latest and most advanced attraction, with an overwhelming sense of immersion that elicited applause after the attraction, reminiscent of Tokyo Disney Resort's popular attractions ``Soarin'' and ``Beauty and the Beast: A Magical Tale.''.
No more.that tangled ride would fit pretty well where IaSW in mk is right now...just sayin.
I think Peter Pan was done really thoughtfully although it's not my favorite type of attraction.I think I'll enjoy Frozen more than Beauty and the Beast, but I don't think it moves the needle for my Top 3 at TDS (ToT, IJA, JttCotE). Not sure about Peter Pan, but on paper it should be the superior screen-based attraction to Soaring.
Includes brief on-ride footage from Peter Pan.
On a quick thought as far as I’m concerned not one of these 4 newbies even cracks the top 10 on property:
[[Beauty & Beast
Hightower Hotel
Crystal Skull
Splash Mnt
Sindbad
Journey to Center
20K Leagues
Hunny Hunt
Soarin
Monsters Inc]]
None of these FS rides merits headlining the resort.
As a package it’s an impressive release but individually I’m shaking my head “no”
At least the grounds and facades are top shelf, commensurate in quality with the rest of Disney Sea
the pics from peter pan dont look that amazing imo...it looks like the ride vehicles are made so you cant look to your sides, just straight ahead.....
I’m not really sure where this is coming from? Perhaps you’re commenting on criticism from outside the forum?
Frozen and Pan were absolutely built to be E-ticket attractions.
Tangled and Tink attractions were not. I don’t see anyone complaining about Tink, and the consensus on here seems to be that Tangled is punching above its weight regardless of whatever their goal was.
That said, unlike some other non-E-ticket attractions, Tangled seems like it could be greatly elevated into the next tier of attractions with a simple scene upgrade, whereas most C/D tickets usually would need several additional things.
I don’t really think that’s complaining that everything isn’t an E, it seems to be a very impressive ride for what it is.
there is absolutely no way they are not going to headline these attractions in some sort of way.
Did Disney ever claim Frozen and Pan were going to be "E-tickets"
Disney sets a ticket designation for every attraction. Just because they don’t always publicize it doesn’t mean it’s not the standard that was set.Did Disney ever claim Frozen and Pan were going to be "E-tickets" - I genuinely don't know but even if that's what the rampant speculation on an online forum was, it's not fair to hold someone to a standard they never set for themselves.
Disney absolutely did designate these attractions as a C, D, and two E’s. InternallyNo, OLC did not; however it most certainly implied these rides are heavy hitters. After all they created a Hotel around the land and are marketing vacation packages for Fan Springs.
Even the photos with the 2d screen imagery look good. They blend in very well with their surroundings, 3d will just enhance that experience.That Frozen scene with Anna thawing from the act of true love has the potential to be very impressive.
So there are no AAs in Peter Pan after all, which was my biggest concern. What will make or break this ride for me is how immersive the 3D and motion are.
EDIT: The following non-spoiler review of it does make me more hopeful though.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.