The general trend I see: unless the number of points offered is significantly low (under 100 points), the price-per-point cost is almost always the same regardless of how many points are being offered.
To me, it seems like the owner is at a disadvantage when owning a single large membership (300+ points) versus several smaller memberships (three 100 point packages).
Can someone enlightening me as to why the price-per-point cost is pretty static for any offering over the 100 point threshold?
To me, it seems like the owner is at a disadvantage when owning a single large membership (300+ points) versus several smaller memberships (three 100 point packages).
Can someone enlightening me as to why the price-per-point cost is pretty static for any offering over the 100 point threshold?